2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residential implementation of critical-peak pricing of electricity

Abstract: This paper investigates how critical-peak pricing (CPP) affects households with different usage and income levels, with the goal of informing policy makers who are -916-654-4328; fax: +1-916-653-3478 Email address: KBHerter@lbl.gov. 1 $50,000 annually were the most likely of the groups to see bill increases -about 5% saw bill increases of 10% or more -suggesting that any residential CPP implementation might consider targeting this customer group for increased energy efficiency efforts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
149
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
149
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This might represent a more effective use of resources than a blanket invitation and marketing campaign for opt in programs [Rocky Mountain Institute, 2006; see also Herter, 2007].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might represent a more effective use of resources than a blanket invitation and marketing campaign for opt in programs [Rocky Mountain Institute, 2006; see also Herter, 2007].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in figure 1, in monopoly situation, electric power enterprises price for Pm which is far higher than the marginal cost pricing Pc, the result reflected in the reality is high electricity price and little electricity supply (Herter K, 2007). Under perfect competition market condition, the commodity price of the goods is equal to marginal revenue and marginal cost, namely:…”
Section: Electricity Price Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policymakers can proactively address customer resistance and engage "smart users" to realize greater change [55]. Policymakers may proactively address vulnerable groups and those adversely affected by these changes, especially resulting from changes in pricing systems [56,57].…”
Section: How Can Public Policy Encourage the Interaction Of A Smart Gmentioning
confidence: 99%