1972
DOI: 10.2307/3896660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Effects of Range Renovation on Dense Clubmoss and Associated Vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…in 1991, a year of very wet conditions. Club moss can have a negative influence on forage yields (Dolan and Taylor 1972). In contrast to our results, Bremer et al (1994), in a Dark Brown Chernozem in southern Alberta, reported significantly greater (P < 0.05) amounts of total N in the 0-to 30-cm depth under a native grass (Agropyron spp.)…”
Section: Soc Changes -Effect Of Crop Residue Inputscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…in 1991, a year of very wet conditions. Club moss can have a negative influence on forage yields (Dolan and Taylor 1972). In contrast to our results, Bremer et al (1994), in a Dark Brown Chernozem in southern Alberta, reported significantly greater (P < 0.05) amounts of total N in the 0-to 30-cm depth under a native grass (Agropyron spp.)…”
Section: Soc Changes -Effect Of Crop Residue Inputscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Water loss increased through evaporation owing to higher temperature and wind at soil surface, and through runoff owing to soil compaction. Surface soil drying was observed in grazed grasslands (Dolan and Taylor 1972). Therefore, an elevation of surface soil pH reflected a decrease in soil humidity in L. chinensis and A. frigida grassland following grazing (Fig.4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The unsatisfactory yield of CWG may be partly due to invasion of the plots by spike moss in the wet year of 1991. Moss can have a negative effect on forage yields (Dolan and Taylor 1972). We estimated that, in spring 1999, moss covered an average of 4.4% of the plot area.…”
Section: Soil C Levelsmentioning
confidence: 97%