Residual Effects: Young Adult Diagnostic Drinking Predicts Late-Life Health Outcomes

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Objective: This study examined the residual effects of young adult diagnostic drinking on health outcomes four decades later in late life. Results were differentiated by drinking status during midlife. Method: A subsample of Vietnam Era Twin Registry members, all of whom had a lifetime diagnosis of alcohol dependence, was grouped according to life span drinking patterns as assessed by the Lifetime Drinking History interview in 2001. Those drinking at diagnostic levels (endorsing three or more alcohol dependence symptoms) before age 30 were then grouped based on their midlife drinking status (i.e., drinking at diagnostic levels vs. at minimal [nonsymptomatic] levels throughout midlife). Linear (or logistic) regression models were used to examine the association between life span drinking patterns and health outcomes in late life (about age 64). Results: Those who drank at diagnostic levels in young adulthood and in midlife exhibited significant health liabilities on every late-life health measure; those who drank at diagnostic levels for 5 or more years in young adulthood but drank only at minimal levels or not at all in midlife still exhibited similar liabilities on most late-life health measures. Only those individuals who drank diagnostically for less than 5 years in young adulthood displayed normal levels of late-life health. Conclusions: This study identified residual effects resulting from persistent young adult diagnostic drinking (5 or more years) that resulted in negative health outcomes in late life even after decades of remission. There is a distal but surprisingly strong association between persistent early life diagnostic drinking and late-life morbidity. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 77, 859-867, 2016)

Compensatory neuroadaptation to binge drinking: Human evidence for allostasis

“…Alcohol consumption is pervasive in western cultures with binge drinking (BD) being the dominant pattern of alcohol misuse during adolescence and early adulthood 1 . With rising prevalence rates and harmful consequences, 2 hazardous alcohol intake is an increasingly important public health concern. Furthermore, brain development continues at least until the age of 25, 3 and this period overlaps with the age range in which BD most frequently occurs, 1,3 rendering critical brain maturation processes vulnerable to excessive alcohol exposure.…”

“…It is commonly defined as drinking enough alcohol to reach blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08%, which is approximated with an intake of 5/4 drinks for males/females within a 2‐h interval 4 . However, many individuals, particularly those in their early 20s, consume alcohol at much higher levels, 5 which is accompanied by harmful consequences that scale with intake 2 . An individual's drinking patterns and the associated deleterious effects emerge from a complex interplay of psychosocial and heritable factors whose influence varies over the lifespan 6 .…”

Reaction Time and Visual Memory in Connection with Alcohol Use in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder

“…Study findings suggesting a positive association between alcohol use and cognition could be attributed to unmeasured or residual confounding factors [ 79 , 80 ], such as smoking [ 81 ], drink types [ 82 ], drinking patterns [ 83 ], personality [ 81 , 84 ], intelligence [ 70 , 85 , 86 ], educational attainment [ 87 , 88 ], potential abstainer errors [ 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 ], reverse causality bias [ 93 ], recall error [ 94 ], within-person temporal variation [ 95 , 96 ], ascertainment of diseases [ 97 ], and the sociability effect of alcohol [ 98 ]. Study findings suggesting a positive association between alcohol use and cognition could be attributed to poor motivation [ 99 , 100 , 101 ].…”

Alcohol, Age, and Mortality: Estimating Selection Bias Due to Premature Death

“…drink, in order to prolong life. One reason for this is that those who are established drinkers at age 50 are "survivors" of their alcohol consumption who might have been healthier or have had safer drinking patterns compared with all persons who began to drink (Gmel et al, 2003;Haber et al, 2016;Naimi et al, 2017;Staff & Maggs, 2017). Conversely, nondrinkers who start to drink in middle age would include some who are more vulnerable to alcohol and who might have already died had they begun drinking earlier in life.…”