2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)32288-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Generator Computation for Fault Detection of a General Aviation Aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pole location influences the transient dynamics of the designed residual filters, while the steady-state properties depend on the PM residual design, as it maximises the residual steady-state values with respect to step faults affecting input and output sensors. The poles of the residual functions could be optimised with respect to both fault and disturbance terms, as shown, for example, in a work by the same authors [17].…”
Section: Pm Residual Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pole location influences the transient dynamics of the designed residual filters, while the steady-state properties depend on the PM residual design, as it maximises the residual steady-state values with respect to step faults affecting input and output sensors. The poles of the residual functions could be optimised with respect to both fault and disturbance terms, as shown, for example, in a work by the same authors [17].…”
Section: Pm Residual Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adopted model has the relevant advantage of being explicitable, and hence suitable of a state space representation. The parameters in the analytic representation of the aerodynamic actions have been obtained from wind tunnel experimental data of a Piper PA30 [7], and the aerodynamic actions are expressed along the axes of the wind reference system. The non-linear attitude model is given by following relations by using the nomenclature introduced at the beginning:…”
Section: Aircraft Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table (III) finally collects the minimal detectable and isolable fault amplitudes ρ on the aircraft actuators, when a simple geometric analysis (with respect to the fixed thresholds) of the residual signals r(t) has been performed with reference to the considered fault cases. Moreover, Table (III) reports and compares also the minimal detectable faults presented in a previous study [7] when the input and output aircraft measurements were assumed noise-free.…”
Section: Application Examplementioning
confidence: 99%