2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual pulmonary thromboemboli after acute pulmonary embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
20
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
20
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…CTEPH develops from 0.1 to 8.8% of the patients (14) whilst residual perfusion defects are reported to range between >50% in older studies (15,16) and 26% in more recent observations (8). The reasons for this discrepancy are largely unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CTEPH develops from 0.1 to 8.8% of the patients (14) whilst residual perfusion defects are reported to range between >50% in older studies (15,16) and 26% in more recent observations (8). The reasons for this discrepancy are largely unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…M a n u s c r i p t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 In a substantial number of acute PE patients persistent perfusion defects remain after anticoagulant treatment, even if applied according to standard guidelines and follow-up (8). The clinical significance of these perfusion defects is currently unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Alonso-Martinez et al . [14] found overall in 26% of their patients residual thrombi using varying time points of evaluation and MDCT as imaging modality. In their cohort evaluated between 5 and 6 months after diagnosis, which accounted for only 15% of their total study population, residual thrombi were found in 16% of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] study (appearing in the mentioned review),[9] Q scintigraphy alone in the Wartski and Collignon[18] (from the same review)[9] or semi-quantified V/Q scanning[11] versus MDCT,[9121415] or a combination of both. [13] Furthermore, these studies often differ in time intervals at which patients were reassessed (varying between 1 month and 1 year) and in the type of patients included (provoked versus unprovoked PE; first versus recurrent episodes of PE) further explaining the differences in proportions of patients with residual Q-defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation