Mechanical Engineering Series 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-39030-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Stress Measurement and the Slitting Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though, destructive & non-destructive type measurement approaches are included in this group but all possible varieties of measurement techniques are not equally effective. Some mostly used destructive stress measurement techniques are a) Sectioning Method 2, 3,9) b) Contour Method 10,11) c) Hole-drilling Method 1,2,3) d) Slitting method 12,13) e) Ring core Method 14,15) etc. Nowadays, several advanced non-destructive techniques like X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique 16,17) , Neutron diffraction technique 18,19) , Ultrasonic technique 20,21) , Positron annihilation spectroscopic technique (PAS) 22) , Barkhausen noise method 23,24) etc.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though, destructive & non-destructive type measurement approaches are included in this group but all possible varieties of measurement techniques are not equally effective. Some mostly used destructive stress measurement techniques are a) Sectioning Method 2, 3,9) b) Contour Method 10,11) c) Hole-drilling Method 1,2,3) d) Slitting method 12,13) e) Ring core Method 14,15) etc. Nowadays, several advanced non-destructive techniques like X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique 16,17) , Neutron diffraction technique 18,19) , Ultrasonic technique 20,21) , Positron annihilation spectroscopic technique (PAS) 22) , Barkhausen noise method 23,24) etc.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual stress at the surface of the coating was determined using the strain reading obtained at a depth of 20 µm. The strain gauge readings were affected by cutting induced stresses and hence cannot be used to evaluate the throughthickness residual stress [44]. The residual stress calculated at a depth of 20 µm is as given below for different coatings.…”
Section: Experimental Estimation Of Residual Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables the users to predict the warping of the workpieces during machining, and thus to adjust and adapt the machining sequence accordingly. As a general remark, several methods have been presented in the literature to estimate residual stress distributions, see the survey presented in Cheng and Finnie (2007). All these techniques share the same feature: the residual stress is released, and the resulting change of geometry is measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%