2006
DOI: 10.1002/mas.20091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residue analysis of 500 high priority pesticides: Better by GC–MS or LC–MS/MS?

Abstract: This overview evaluates the capabilities of mass spectrometry (MS) in combination with gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) for the determination of a multitude of pesticides. The selection of pesticides for this assessment is based on the status of production, the existence of regulations on maximum residue levels in food, and the frequency of residue detection. GC-MS with electron impact (EI) ionization and the combination of LC with tandem mass spectrometers (LC-MS/MS) using electrospray i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
310
0
20

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 555 publications
(333 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
310
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Until recently, the multiresidue methods that have frequently been used were gas chromatography (GC) equipped with an electroncapture detector (ECD), nitrogen-phosphorous detector (NPD) or mass spectrometer (MS) (Sherma, 2001;Pang et al, 2006). For less volatile and thermally unstable residues that are not GC-compatible, liquid chromatography coupled to a UV and fluorescence detector or mass spectrometer has been used (Picó et al, 2000;Schwedler et al, 2000;Sancho et al, 2003;Alder et al, 2006). However, such methods frequently suffer from low selectivity and sensitivity, or a tedious clean-up procedure is required for sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the multiresidue methods that have frequently been used were gas chromatography (GC) equipped with an electroncapture detector (ECD), nitrogen-phosphorous detector (NPD) or mass spectrometer (MS) (Sherma, 2001;Pang et al, 2006). For less volatile and thermally unstable residues that are not GC-compatible, liquid chromatography coupled to a UV and fluorescence detector or mass spectrometer has been used (Picó et al, 2000;Schwedler et al, 2000;Sancho et al, 2003;Alder et al, 2006). However, such methods frequently suffer from low selectivity and sensitivity, or a tedious clean-up procedure is required for sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix-matched standards were prepared for each sample matrix as follows: after the cleanup step, 50 L of the MeCN extract obtained from a blank sample were mixed with 250 L of hexane, 150 L of acetone, and 50 L of the pesticide standard solution in 6 hexane at adequate concentration to obtain a calibration range of 0.1-100 ng/mL (corresponding to 1-1000 g/kg in sample).…”
Section: Sample Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a major part of the pesticides, liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry is considered as the method of choice [6]. However, many pesticides are also amenable to gas chromatography (GC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) which makes it a valuable complementary technique, especially because it is the only option for certain pesticide classes and therefore has to be used anyway.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many application dealing with pesticide residue analysis, electrospray in positive ionization mode was used (Alder et al 2006;Pico et al 2004). However, the literature shows that the best sensitivity is obtained either by electrospray or APCI, depending on the make of the instrument and design of the ionization source (Pico et al 2004).…”
Section: Organophosphorus Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%