Residues of Profenofos with Special Reference to its Removal Trials and Biochemical Effects on Tomato

Abstract

During June of 2016 tomato plants were sprayed with profenofos (Seliton 72% E.C.) at the rate of 750 cm 3 / feddan (540 g a.i.). Leaves and fruits samples were collected at 2 hrs to 15 days after application and analyzed using GC. Results revealed that, the initial amounts in leaves were much higher than in tomato fruits. A rapid degradation of profenofos residues was noticed in tomato fruits comparing with tomato leaves. The washing of the treated fruits (2 hours) with tap water or 1% of soap, sodium chloride, acetic acid and potassium permanganate reduced indicating the initial deposits (20.53 mg/kg) to 6.11, 9.03, 7.69, 9.87 and 5.06 mg/kg indicating 70.24, 56.02, 62.54, 51.92 and 75.35% dislodge, respectively. Preparation of tomato paste reduced profenofos residues to undetected amounts being 100% removal. The consumable safety time was 3 days after application and this period could be shorted to two hours after spraying if harvested tomato fruits were washed with the above mentioned washing solutions or prepared to tomato paste. Profenofos significantly reduced the mean levels of each N, P, K, Ca, Fe, Mn. As well as the mean levels of total soluble solid (T.S.S.), ascorbic acid, β-carotene, acidity and protein were significantly reduced at 6, 9 and 15 days of spraying. The mean amounts of total soluble sugars and glucose were not significantly affected by profenofos. Dry matter in treated tomato fruits were significantly increased compared with control.

Effects of Pesticide Treatments on The Fatty Acids of Egyptian Cotton Seeds Giza 86 Variety

“…Conversely, the fatty acid Linoleic acid C18:2w6 increased from 31.45% in the organic Giza 86 to 42.20% in the treated Giza 86 and also slightly increased the value of Palmitic acid (C16:0) at 24.39% in the treated variety Giza 86 compared than 24.14% in the organic variety. Some pesticides significantly affected the chemical components of some plants after use as reported by several authors Radwan (1988); Habiba et al (1992); Ismail et al (1995); Radwan et al (2004);and Shalaby (2016).…”