Study design: Cross-sectional survey. Objective: To examine factors that contribute to the process of positive adjustment, or resilience, in an adult community sample with spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: South Australian Spinal Cord Injury Service, Hampstead Rehabilitation Centre, South Australia, Australia Methods: A postal survey comprising standardised measures of resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 item), self-efficacy (Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale), locus of control (Locus of Control of Behaviour Scale) and psychological distress (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 item). Results: Of 60 respondents, 58% reported moderate to high levels of resilience. Resilience correlated significantly with high selfefficacy (r ¼ 0.68, Po0.01), internal locus of control (r ¼ À0.52, Po0.01) and low psychological distress (depression r ¼ À0.68, Po0.01; anxiety r ¼ À0.55, Po0.01; stress r ¼ À0.67, Po0.01). In comparison, resilience was not significantly influenced by degree of neuropathic pain (r ¼ À0.23, P40.05), time since injury (r ¼ À0.14, P40.05), gender (t (58) ¼ À0.92, P40.05), lesion completeness (t (57) ¼ À0.86, P40.05), or SCI diagnosis (t (58) ¼ À1.21, P40.05). A multiple regression indicated that psychological distress and self-efficacy were the only two variables that uniquely contributed to resilient behaviour. Conclusion: Resilience is an important psychological process in the longer-term management of SCI which can be promoted by targeting rehabilitation interventions towards mood management in addition to self efficacy beliefs. Larger-scale research will help to validate these results.