2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2016.7798795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilient randomized quantized consensus with delayed information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The (2f + 1)-robustness as a sufficient condition is consistent with the resilient consensus problems in [9] and [13] for the real-valued agent cases with first-order and secondorder dynamics, respectively. However, these works consider consensus without any randomization in their updates.…”
Section: Proposition 54mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The (2f + 1)-robustness as a sufficient condition is consistent with the resilient consensus problems in [9] and [13] for the real-valued agent cases with first-order and secondorder dynamics, respectively. However, these works consider consensus without any randomization in their updates.…”
Section: Proposition 54mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It was first introduced by [24] for analysis of resilient consensus of real-valued first-order multi-agent systems. Related works include [9] which studied the case with delays in communication and [10], [13] for the case of agents with real-valued second-order dynamics. We use the more general notion of (r, s)-robust graphs, which plays an important role to obtain a tight necessary and sufficient condition.…”
Section: A Graph Theory Notionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations