Resin Ionomer Restorative Materials: The New Generation

Burgess, John O.; Norling, Barry K.; Summitt, James B.

doi:10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00861.x

Cited by 78 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Under the conditions of the study, the magnitude of early SBS values without CHX (8.3 MPa) was close to those obtained in the literature with similar adhesion tests [32][33][34] and with adhesive failures being predominant. The presence of CHX did not affect the early SBS (9.0 MPa).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Effect of Chlorhexidine Application on the Long-term Shear Bond Strength to Dentin of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer

Dursun

Goff

Ruse

et al. 2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The application of 0.05% chlorhexidine digluconate after polyalkenoic acid conditioning (Cavity Conditionert) of dentin and prior to application of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LCt) should be avoided. SUMMARYPurpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) application on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to polyalkenoic acid-preconditioned dentin after 24 hours, six months, and 12 months of water storage at 378C. Materials and Methods: Cylindrical molds, placed on flat, polyalkenoic acid (Cavity Conditionert [GC]) preconditioned dentin surfaces of 90 human teeth embedded in resin, were filled with Fuji II LCt (GC), a RMGIC, with (n=45) or without (n=45) the prior application of a 0.05% CHX solution. Within each group, SBS was determined after 24 hours (n=15), six months (n=15), and 12 months (n=15) of storage in water at 378C. The results were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey multiple means comparisons (p,0.05). The type of bond failure (adhesive/cohesive/ mixed) was noted and the results were analyzed with chi-square test (p,0.05).Results: After 24 hours, the SBS of RMGIC was not significantly different with (9.0 6 2.8 MPa) or without (8.360.6 MPa) the application

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Effect of Chlorhexidine Application on the Long-term Shear Bond Strength to Dentin of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer

Dursun

Goff

Ruse

et al. 2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Measures to increase protective factors such as fluoride therapy may be adopted as part of these approaches, inhibiting tooth demineralization and enhancing remineralizing potential. 12 In the 1960's, a new topical fluoride preparation APF was introduced by Brudevold and his coworkers at Forsyth Dental Centre. APF preparation contains sodium fluoride as the active ingredient.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In vitro Evaluation of Topical Fluoride ph and their Effect on Surface Hardness of Composite Resin-based Restorative Materials

Mujeeb¹,

Mansuri²,

Hussain³

et al. 2014

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim of the study was to correlate the pH and fluoride ion uptake with surface hardness of composite resin based restorative materials after topical fluoride application.Methodology: Forty disks of each of test materials Composite (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), Resin modified glass ionomer (Vitremer) and Compomer (Dyract AP) were made and ten disks of each material were placed in different test solutions -1.23% APF gel, Sodium fluoride mouth rinse, 0.9% neutral fluoride and distilled water (Control group). After 36 hours of immersion, specimens were subjected to microhardness testing machine for evaluation of surface hardness. Results:The greater hardness deterioration for all materials resulted with 1.23% APF gel when compared to the control group. Composite (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) showed 17.13 VHN (control group 59.11 VHN). Vitremer showed 9.71 VHN (control group 37.71 VHN). Compomer showed 19.22 VHN (control group 36.78 VHN). Conclusion:1.23% ApF gel significantly decreased hardness of composite, Vitremer and Compomer. Hardness deterioration associated with sodium fluoride mouth rinse and 0.9% neutral fluoride was less compared to 1.23% ApF gel.

show abstract

“…The responses to GICs differ by cell type. Thus, it is important to evaluate the cytoxicity of GICs to SHEDs [6][7][8][9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements correlates with the necrotic death of human dental pulp stem cells

Kanjevac¹,

Milovanović²,

Volarević³

et al. 2011

Ser J Exp Clin Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Resin Ionomer Restorative Materials: The New Generation

Cited by 78 publications

References 17 publications

Effect of Chlorhexidine Application on the Long-term Shear Bond Strength to Dentin of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer

Effect of Chlorhexidine Application on the Long-term Shear Bond Strength to Dentin of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer

In vitro Evaluation of Topical Fluoride ph and their Effect on Surface Hardness of Composite Resin-based Restorative Materials

Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements correlates with the necrotic death of human dental pulp stem cells

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About