2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0076-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance of aerobic microorganisms and soil enzyme response to soil contamination with Ekodiesel Ultra fuel

Abstract: This study determined the susceptibility of cultured soil microorganisms to the effects of Ekodiesel Ultra fuel (DO), to the enzymatic activity of soil and to soil contamination with PAHs. Studies into the effects of any type of oil products on reactions taking place in soil are necessary as particular fuels not only differ in the chemical composition of oil products but also in the composition of various fuel improvers and antimicrobial fuel additives. The subjects of the study included loamy sand and sandy l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have described the quantitative and/or qualitative changes in the bacterial communities, in response to the increase in the concentrations of the different heavy metals in the agricultural soils and forest soils (Åkerblom, Bååth, Bringmark, & Bringmark, 2007;Cruz-Paredes, Wallander, Kjøller, & Rousk, 2017;Igalavithana et al, 2017;Pennanen, Frostegard, Fritze, & Baath, 1996;Sharaff, Kamat, & Archana, 2017). Some of these studies have also correlated the structural changes to the soil functions such as enzymatic activities (Åkerblom et al, 2007;Borowik, Wyszkowska, & Wyszkowski, 2017). Even microbial enzymes have been proposed to be used as the early warning tools for monitoring the soils at mining sites (Wahsha et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have described the quantitative and/or qualitative changes in the bacterial communities, in response to the increase in the concentrations of the different heavy metals in the agricultural soils and forest soils (Åkerblom, Bååth, Bringmark, & Bringmark, 2007;Cruz-Paredes, Wallander, Kjøller, & Rousk, 2017;Igalavithana et al, 2017;Pennanen, Frostegard, Fritze, & Baath, 1996;Sharaff, Kamat, & Archana, 2017). Some of these studies have also correlated the structural changes to the soil functions such as enzymatic activities (Åkerblom et al, 2007;Borowik, Wyszkowska, & Wyszkowski, 2017). Even microbial enzymes have been proposed to be used as the early warning tools for monitoring the soils at mining sites (Wahsha et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochemical analyses included determination of dehydrogenase activity (Deh), catalase (Cat), urease (Ure), acid phosphatase (Pac), alkaline phosphatase (Pal), arylsulphatase (Aryl) and β-glucosidase (Glu). Determinations of the analysed soil enzymes were performed in three replications according to the procedure described in Borowik et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counts of organotrophic bacteria (Org) and actinobacteria (Act) were determined in individual soil samples from the cultivation of each of the studied plant species (winter wheat, winter rape, field pea) with the serial dilution method, in three replications. Microbial counts were performed according the media and procedure described by Borowik et al [50]. The composition of the microbiological media was as follows: organotrophic bacteria (Bunt and Rovira medium): agar medium (peptone 1.0 g, yeast extract 1.0 g, (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 0.5 g, CaCl 2 , K 2 HPO 4 0.4 g, MgCl 2 0,2 g, MgSO 4 7H 2 O 0.5 g, salt Mo 0.03 g, FeCl 2 0.01 g, agar 20.0 g, soil extract 250 cm 3 , distilled water 750 cm 3 , pH 6.6-7.0; Actinomycetes (Parkinson medium): soluble starch 10.0 g; casein 0.3 g; KNO 3 2.0 g; NaCl 2.0 g; K 2 HPO 4 2.0 g; MgSO4•7H2O 0.05 g; CaCO 3 0.02 g; FeSO 4 0.01 g; agar 20.0 g; H 2 O 1 dm 3 ; 50 cm 3 aqueous solution of nystatin 0.05%; 50 cm 3 aqueous solution of actidione 0.05%; pH 7.0.…”
Section: Bacterial Countmentioning
confidence: 99%