2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.09.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance to He2+ induced irradiation damage in metallic glass Zr64Cu17.8Ni10.7Al7.5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research by Wang et al focused on a larger fluence. The helium bubble diameter in Zr-based metallic glass in their study was approximately 10 times larger than in ours, and blistering, peeling, and flaking did not occur [38]. As a result of the SRIM calculation, the metallic glass Fe 80 Si 7.43 B 12.57 density was 8.4599 × 10 22 atoms/cm 3 , that of metallic glass Ta 38 Ni 62 was 6.7715 × 10 22 atoms/cm 3 , and that of metallic glass Zr 64 Cu 17.8 Ni 10.7 Al 7.5 was 5.3242 × 10 22 atoms/cm 3 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Research by Wang et al focused on a larger fluence. The helium bubble diameter in Zr-based metallic glass in their study was approximately 10 times larger than in ours, and blistering, peeling, and flaking did not occur [38]. As a result of the SRIM calculation, the metallic glass Fe 80 Si 7.43 B 12.57 density was 8.4599 × 10 22 atoms/cm 3 , that of metallic glass Ta 38 Ni 62 was 6.7715 × 10 22 atoms/cm 3 , and that of metallic glass Zr 64 Cu 17.8 Ni 10.7 Al 7.5 was 5.3242 × 10 22 atoms/cm 3 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The different amount of free volume in the metallic glass made their helium solubility different, thus the helium bubble size was different. Under their respective irradiation conditions, all three types of metallic glass conditions resisted He 2+ ion irradiation better than W. The peak DPA of metallic glass Ta 38 Ni 62 under He 2+ irradiation at 1 × 10 18 ions/cm 2 was 29 dpa, whereas the peak DPA of metallic W was 16 dpa, which was the DPA required for W in the demonstration power plant as the divertor for 5 years [39]. Although the peak DPA of metallic glass was greater than that of W, because of the short-range ordered and long-range disordered structure, metallic glass could not generate lattice defects like the crystal, and ion irradiation damage in metallic glass was smaller than that in the crystal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations