2020
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistance to the Fumigant Phosphine and Its Management in Insect Pests of Stored Products: A Global Perspective

Abstract: Development of resistance in major grain insect pest species to the key fumigant phosphine (hydrogen phosphide) across the globe has put the viability and sustainability of phosphine in jeopardy. The resistance problem has been aggravated over the past two decades, due mostly to the lack of suitable alternatives matching the major attributes of phosphine, including its low price, ease of application, proven effectiveness against a broad pest spectrum, compatibility with most storage conditions, and internation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
105
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
2
105
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…As the use of methyl bromide was being phased-out in the stored product pests control programs, phosphine fumigation became the most popular control method around the globe. Compared to other potential alternatives such as sulfuryl fluoride, carbonyl sulfide, propylene oxide, ethyl formate, and hydrogen cyanide, phosphine has unique benefits including lowest costs, various formulations that are easy to apply, rapid dispersion into the treated areas due to its similar density to air, and fast break down after fumigation [5]. However, the lack of compatible alternatives and repeated use of phosphine treatment in industrial storages as well as in flour mills has resulted in the development of resistance in various stored product insect pests, which emphasizes the need for additional pest management products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the use of methyl bromide was being phased-out in the stored product pests control programs, phosphine fumigation became the most popular control method around the globe. Compared to other potential alternatives such as sulfuryl fluoride, carbonyl sulfide, propylene oxide, ethyl formate, and hydrogen cyanide, phosphine has unique benefits including lowest costs, various formulations that are easy to apply, rapid dispersion into the treated areas due to its similar density to air, and fast break down after fumigation [5]. However, the lack of compatible alternatives and repeated use of phosphine treatment in industrial storages as well as in flour mills has resulted in the development of resistance in various stored product insect pests, which emphasizes the need for additional pest management products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lack of compatible alternatives and repeated use of phosphine treatment in industrial storages as well as in flour mills has resulted in the development of resistance in various stored product insect pests, which emphasizes the need for additional pest management products. The current situation of phosphine resistance is well documented [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study evaluated the activity of PH 3 and COS against two stored-product pests, T. castaneum (d-strain and r-strain) and O. surinamensis. PH 3 shows fumigation activity against various grain pests, T. castaneum, Rhyzopertha dominica, and O. surinamensis, but an increase in the resistant strain of these insects has been reported [11,[38][39][40]. This experiment was performed to investigate an alternative fumigant that is effective against PH 3 -resistant pests, especially T. castaneum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to free residual advantages over chemical fumigation [27], irradiation has become an established technique for controlling stored grain insects [28]. Pszczola [29], demonstrated the acceptability of irradiation technology as an alternative treatment for food protection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%