Resistance Training and Type 2 Diabetes

Eves, Neil D.; Plotnikoff, Ronald C.

doi:10.2337/dc05-1981

Cited by 178 publications

(134 citation statements)

References 83 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

119

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Meta-analyses and other studies have demonstrated that aerobic and resistance exercise each improves glycaemic control in people with this condition [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Effects of aerobic exercise, resistance exercise or both, on patient-reported health status and well-being in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised trial

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims/hypothesis The Diabetes Aerobic and Resistance Exercise (DARE) study showed that aerobic and resistance exercise training each improved glycaemic control and that a combination of both was superior to either type alone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Here we report effects on patient-reported health status and well-being in the DARE Trial. Methods We randomised 218 inactive participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus in parallel to 22 weeks of aerobic exercise (n=51), resistance exercise (n=58), combined aerobic and resistance exercise (n=57) or no exercise (control; n=52). Intervention allocation was managed by a central office. Outcomes included health status as assessed by the physical and mental component scores of the Medical Outcomes Trust Short-Form 36-item version (SF-36) and well-being as measured by the Well-Being Questionnaire 12-item version (WBQ-12); these were measured at the Ottawa Hospital. Results Using a p value of 0.0125 for statistical significance due to multiple comparisons, mixed model analyses indicated that resistance exercise led to clinically but not statistically significant improvements in the SF-36 physical component score compared with aerobic exercise (Δ=2.7 points; p=0.048) and control (i.e. no exercise; Δ=3.3 points; p=0.015). For mental component scores, there were clinically important improvements favouring no (control) compared with resistance (Δ=7.6 points; p<0.001) and combined (Δ=7.2 points; p<0.001) exercise. No effects on WBQ-12 scores were noted. Overall, 59/218 (27%) of participants included in this analysis sustained an adverse event during the course of the study, including 16 participants in the combined exercise group, 19 participants in the resistance exercise group, 16 participants in the Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article

show abstract

“…Meta-analyses and other studies have demonstrated that aerobic and resistance exercise each improves glycaemic control in people with this condition [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Effects of aerobic exercise, resistance exercise or both, on patient-reported health status and well-being in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised trial

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…7 Resistance training is also an important physical activity that can prevent or treat lifestyle-related diseases. 8,9 Thus, resistance training can be useful for maintaining or improving physical condition. However, high-intensity resistance training reduces arterial compliance and increases arterial stiffness.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of muscle contraction timing during resistance training on vascular function

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Muscle contractions in normal resistance training are performed by eccentric (ECC, lowering phase) and concentric (CON, lifting phase) muscle contractions. However, the difference in effects of timing of muscle contraction during resistance training on arterial stiffness is unknown. This study investigated the effect of muscle contraction timing during resistance training on vascular function in healthy young adults. Thirty healthy men were randomly assigned to group of resistance training with quick lifting and slow lowering (ERT, n ¼ 10), group of resistance training with slow lifting and quick lowering (CRT, n ¼ 10) and sedentary groups (SED, n ¼ 10). The ERT and CRT groups underwent two supervised resistance-training sessions per week for 10 weeks. The ERT group performed the on set of 8-10 repetitions with 3 s ECC and 1 s CON muscle contractions. In contrast, the CRT group performed the on set of 8-10 repetitions with 1 s ECC and 3 s CON muscle contractions. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) after ERT did not change from baseline. In contrast, baPWV after CRT increased from baseline (from 1049 ± 37 to 1153±30 cm s À1 , Po0.05). No significant changes in flow-mediated dilation were observed in the ERT and CRT groups. These values did not change in the SED group. These findings suggest that although both training does not deteriorate a vascular endothelial function, resistance training with quick lifting and slow lowering (that is, ERT) prevent the stiffening of arterial stiffness.

show abstract

“…[1][2][3] Similar to aerobic exercise, 4 RT improves glucose control and insulin sensitivity, which reduces plasma insulin levels and increases glucose uptake and storage. [1][2][3] Further, RT has the potential for increasing muscle strength, lean muscle mass and bone mineral density, which could enhance functional status and glycemic control and assist in the prevention of sarcopenia and osteoporosis. 1 However, despite the known benefits of RT, few individuals with diabetes incorporate this behavior as part of their diabetes management plan.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multicomponent, home-based resistance training for obese adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To investigate whether a home-based resistance training (RT) program that supplied high-quality equipment and qualified exercise specialists could provide benefits to obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: A total of 48 obese individuals with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to either an RT (n ¼ 27) or a control group (n ¼ 21). Those in the RT group received a multigym and dumbbells and performed RT 3 days per week for 16 weeks at home. A qualified exercise specialist supervised training, with supervision being gradually decreased throughout the study. Primary outcome measures included strength and hemoglobin-A1C, whereas secondary outcome measures included other cardiovascular risk markers, key social-cognitive constructs and health-related quality of life. Results: Intention-to-treat analyses indicated a significant increase in upper and lower body strength for the RT group compared with controls (20-37% mean increases in the RT group). No significant reduction in A1C levels was observed. The RT group had unchanged high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in comparison to declines in the control group. Significant reductions in fasting insulin, and increases in RT-related self-efficacy and intentions, were also observed in the RT group. Conclusions: Supervised home-based RT with high-quality equipment was effective for improving strength, along with other secondary outcomes in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

show abstract

Resistance Training and Type 2 Diabetes

Cited by 178 publications

References 83 publications

Effects of aerobic exercise, resistance exercise or both, on patient-reported health status and well-being in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised trial

Effects of aerobic exercise, resistance exercise or both, on patient-reported health status and well-being in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised trial

Effects of muscle contraction timing during resistance training on vascular function

Multicomponent, home-based resistance training for obese adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About