2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0144-8617(99)00147-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistant starch—a review of the physical properties and biological impact of RS3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
295
1
29

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 469 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
295
1
29
Order By: Relevance
“…The starch (RS plus IST) found in the CM is extremely hard to remove, and is well established in the literature as resistant starch (RS 1 ) by ENGLYST, KINGMAN and CUMMINGS [13]. However, this starch has beneficial effects, contributing in the same way as ICW-Co as an insoluble dietary fiber as can be seen in the review by HARALAMPU [21].…”
Section: -Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starch (RS plus IST) found in the CM is extremely hard to remove, and is well established in the literature as resistant starch (RS 1 ) by ENGLYST, KINGMAN and CUMMINGS [13]. However, this starch has beneficial effects, contributing in the same way as ICW-Co as an insoluble dietary fiber as can be seen in the review by HARALAMPU [21].…”
Section: -Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RQ was rather high in these pigs during the nightly hours before the first meal, likely reflecting the oxidation of absorbed VFAs, and, particularly in barren housing, de novo fatty acid synthesis from VFA. The gradual and prolonged supply of energy from fermentation of RS potentially increases periods of satiety (Heijnen et al, 1995;Achour et al, 1997;Haralampu, 2000). As feeding motivation seems to increase the physical activity of pigs (Jensen et al, 1993;De Leeuw et al, 2005), fermentation processes could therefore be largely responsible for the reduced activity-related heat production in NSfed pigs, apart from possible specific effects of fermentation products on activity patterns (Schrama and Bakker, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, ileal starch digestibility in diets based on wheat, barley or rice may be over 0.95 (Canibe & Bach Knudsen, 2001;Sun et al, 2006), whereas it is reduced below 0.80 in sources with a high proportion of RS such as potato (Martin et al, 1998) or peas (Sun et al, 2006). In fact, RS is considered to behave physiologically as soluble dietary f ibre in the hindgut (Haralampu, 2000). Comparison of in vitro digestibility of diets based on 0.60 of rice, barley or maize indicates a hindgut contribution to overall organic matter digestibility of 0.09, 0.07 and 0.15, respectively (Pérez-Vendrell & Torrallardona, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%