2018
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1544661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resisting government rendered surveillance in a local authority

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the same technology can be seen at times as caring or coercive, depending on the motivations perceived by workers (Anteby and Chan 2018, 248). Why this all matters is that when employees perceive unfair monitoring, they are more likely to report lower job satisfaction and greater stress (Young 2010) and even engage in resistance and creative avoidance (Kayas et al 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the same technology can be seen at times as caring or coercive, depending on the motivations perceived by workers (Anteby and Chan 2018, 248). Why this all matters is that when employees perceive unfair monitoring, they are more likely to report lower job satisfaction and greater stress (Young 2010) and even engage in resistance and creative avoidance (Kayas et al 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, it might have negative effects on employees’ well-being with monitored employees reporting lower self-esteem and greater feelings of insecurity regarding their job position (Botan, 1996) as well as greater stress (Young, 2010). Stress may also increase because of a general sense of loss of control and lower privacy in the workplace, which increases pressure in performing one's job (Adams & Mastracci, 2019; Kayas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that accounting is not the sole mechanism for policy implementation in the schools' sector. Curriculum, inspection and the use of 'league tables' are cited as other important factors in this context (Edwards et al, 1995;Broadbent and Laughlin, 1998;Kayas et al, 2018). Accounting techniques are often conflated with these other methods of economic calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not argue that accounting has been the sole driver of change in the schools' sector; rather, we contend that it has played an important part in reform. Broadbent and Laughlin (1998) and Kayas et al (2018) argue that changes such as performance inspection have had a greater effect. Still, and as noted by Edwards et al (1995, p. 297), reforms that included accounting disturbances 'embodied expectations and assumptions regarding the relationship between management accounting and organizational change'.…”
Section: Accounting In Public Sector Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%