2004
DOI: 10.1177/0964663904042554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resisting Neo-Liberalism: the Poisoned Water Disaster in Walkerton, Ontario

Abstract: This article examines how relations of governance generate particular forms of resistance, and the mechanisms through which resistance can reconfigure governance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This occurs because the public must believe that experts have properly calibrated their tests (to pick up contaminants at levels where they begin to cause health problems in humans), have tested for all possible contaminants (tests cannot detect what they are not programmed to detect), and will communicate even borderline results efficiently to the public, rather than keeping them hidden in order to avoid inciting "panic." However, as Snider (2004) finds, neoliberal government reforms have drained money and resources away from public officials responsible for such testing, as well as for training of these individuals and reporting regulations (often considered bothersome "red-tape" in the neoliberal context). The result is a lacuna of information for local residents who worry that their immediate environment may be contaminated, but do not have the resources to generate and mobilize their own knowledge about environmental risk and contamination.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurs because the public must believe that experts have properly calibrated their tests (to pick up contaminants at levels where they begin to cause health problems in humans), have tested for all possible contaminants (tests cannot detect what they are not programmed to detect), and will communicate even borderline results efficiently to the public, rather than keeping them hidden in order to avoid inciting "panic." However, as Snider (2004) finds, neoliberal government reforms have drained money and resources away from public officials responsible for such testing, as well as for training of these individuals and reporting regulations (often considered bothersome "red-tape" in the neoliberal context). The result is a lacuna of information for local residents who worry that their immediate environment may be contaminated, but do not have the resources to generate and mobilize their own knowledge about environmental risk and contamination.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a case study of a poisoned water disaster in Canada, Snider (2004) focused on competing ways of framing the neoliberal drive for deregulation and privatization. Thus, for example, she showed that advocates of deregulation consistently emphasize commitments that they frame in terms of being “results‐oriented,” “cost‐effective,” and “flexible.” In this process of reframing, “voluntary action” replaces “harsh penalties,” being “responsive to stakeholders” replaces the traditional “command and control” regulatory model, and notions such as “partnership between adults,” “contract between equals,” and “culture of trust” replace “regulatory rules and red tape.” Similarly, at the Forum meetings there were many exchanges in the course of which “responsibility” was framed as “maintaining good relations with stakeholders,” “social responsibility” was framed as “social involvement,” “society” was framed in terms of “communities,” and “social change” was framed as addressing the needs of communities.…”
Section: The Forummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a case study of a poisoned water disaster in Canada, Snider (2004) focused on competing ways of framing the neoliberal drive for deregulation and privatization. Thus, for example, she showed that advocates of deregulation consistently emphasize commitments that they frame in terms of being "results-oriented," "cost-effective," and "flexible."…”
Section: Language As Initiation: Learning To Speakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of the failures in Walkerton, political divisions widened. The crisis acted as a catalyst for an array of counter-Harris interests among environmental groups, educational/legal élites, trade unions and citizens (Snider 2004). The Walkerton tragedy was also one of the reasons behind Harris's resignation in April 2002 and the failure of his successor, Ernie Eves, to get re-elected in October the following year.…”
Section: The Politics Streammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colin Perkel's book, Well of Lies, on the Walkerton tragedy argues that ''[i]n criticizing public inquiries as a cumbersome, ineffective, and seemingly never-ending process, Premier Mike Harris might have misjudged the man chosen to lead it, Dennis O'Connor'' (Perkel 2002: 201). The risks to public water supplies, in conjunction with O'Connor's leadership, meant that the inquiry was able to investigate and construct narratives around the pillars of modernism (science and the law), avoiding accusations of politicization yet nevertheless being critical of the Harris government, its budget cutbacks at the Ministry of the Environment and the privatization of water laboratories (Snider 2004). Therefore, the O'Connor-led investigation was clearly a catalyst for change, although -as indicated -we must exercise some caution in seeing the investigation as a revolutionary indictment of the Harris years.…”
Section: The Politics Streammentioning
confidence: 99%