2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving patterns of population genetic and phylogeographic structure to inform control and eradication initiatives for brown rats Rattus norvegicus on South Georgia

Abstract: Summary The control and eradication of invasive species is a common management strategy to protect or restore native biodiversity. On South Georgia in the Southern Ocean, the brown rat Rattus norvegicus was brought onto the island with the onset of whaling and sealing activity in the 1800s and has had a significant detrimental impact on key bird species of conservation concern. Efforts to eradicate rats from South Georgia using poisoned bait are ongoing. Despite the South Georgia rat eradication programme be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eradication of invasive Rattus species on islands and in ecosystems with high biodiversity is a priority for conservation of at-risk species, as rats outcompete or kill native fauna. It remains challenging to gauge the success of eradication programs, because it is difficult to distinguish between post-intervention survival and reproduction as opposed to recolonization by new immigrants (Piertney, et al 2016). Understanding fine-scale population genetic structure using dense nuclear marker sets (Robins, et al 2016), as in this study, would allow managers to more clearly assess outcomes and next steps following an eradication campaign.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eradication of invasive Rattus species on islands and in ecosystems with high biodiversity is a priority for conservation of at-risk species, as rats outcompete or kill native fauna. It remains challenging to gauge the success of eradication programs, because it is difficult to distinguish between post-intervention survival and reproduction as opposed to recolonization by new immigrants (Piertney, et al 2016). Understanding fine-scale population genetic structure using dense nuclear marker sets (Robins, et al 2016), as in this study, would allow managers to more clearly assess outcomes and next steps following an eradication campaign.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples of Norway rats from the South Atlantic Ocean were collected at the Falkland Islands (n = 49; 18 locations in five areas), South Georgia (n = 8; seven locations across two regions, previously identified as being genetically distinct [8]), Fernando de Noronha (n = 1) and the towns of Recife and Fortaleza on the coast of Brazil (n = 2) ( Figure 1a). Additional samples (n = 4; four locations from two regions) were obtained from mainland Portugal, the origin of the first maritime explorers to chart the South Atlantic Ocean and from Madeira island (n = 4; 3 locations; Figure 1b), the first oceanic island colonized by the Portuguese and an important stop-over in the Atlantic during the European maritime expansion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite more comprehensive sampling, our cyt b results were very similar to those for cyt b in Techow et al (2009), suggesting that the newly-detected multi-region structure was based on the temporal resolution of markers and not increased sampling. A growing number of studies on Southern Ocean taxa show previously suspected fine-scale population structure using GBS data in species ranging from Durvillaea kelp and brown rats Rattus norvegicus, to emperor and king penguins (Fraser et al, 2016;Fraser et al, 2018;Piertney et al, 2016;Younger et al, 2017Younger et al, , 2015; but see Clucas et al, 2016;Trucchi et al, 2014). In the case of white-chinned petrels, the finer-scale multi-region structure identified using GBS data is consistent with tracking and isotopic work which shows that birds from these regions differ in foraging habitat or at-sea distribution, particularly during the nonbreeding period (Catard et al, 2000;Jaeger et al, 2013;Phillips et al, 2006;Rexer-Huber, 2017;Rollinson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Ability Of Different Marker Types To Detect Structurementioning
confidence: 99%