1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.57.12069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonant electron-exchange excitations in transition-metal oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 0.870 and 2.3 eV peaks are in agreement with x-rays but the 1.84 eV excitation was not resolved with non-resonant xrays and is forbidden in the dipolar approximation, however it has been reported in other optical and x-ray studies such as RIXS and EELS that are sensitive to dipole forbidden cross sections. 38,[43][44][45][46][47] This result highlights the point that the 1.84 ±0.03 eV excitation is dipole forbidden and confirms our claim that we are sampling a quadrupolar matrix element in our neutron scattering experiments.…”
Section: A Comparison With Inelastic X-rays and Optical Techniquessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The 0.870 and 2.3 eV peaks are in agreement with x-rays but the 1.84 eV excitation was not resolved with non-resonant xrays and is forbidden in the dipolar approximation, however it has been reported in other optical and x-ray studies such as RIXS and EELS that are sensitive to dipole forbidden cross sections. 38,[43][44][45][46][47] This result highlights the point that the 1.84 ±0.03 eV excitation is dipole forbidden and confirms our claim that we are sampling a quadrupolar matrix element in our neutron scattering experiments.…”
Section: A Comparison With Inelastic X-rays and Optical Techniquessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The ground state of the Co 2ϩ ion has a 4 T 1 character in O h symmetry. In order to take into account the polarization dependence and ͑super͒exchange interactions, the calculations were made in the C 4h basis set at 0 K. Two configurations were considered: 3d 7 9 L Ϫ2 configuration in the ground state was neglected here since its weight was estimated to be only in the order of ϳ1% in prior studies. 21 The single-impurity Anderson model ͑SIAM͒, 22 with full multiplet effects, was applied to describe the system.…”
Section: Calculational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 However, another EELS publication assigned the ϳ2.0 eV loss feature to the 4 T 1g → 4 A 2g quartet-quartet transition. 7 In spectrum C, the shoulder at ϳ2.3 eV and the peak at ϳ3.2 eV are probably due to the 4 T 1g → 4 T 1g and 4 T 1g → 4 A 2g quartet-quartet transitions, respectively. However, the assignments are difficult and several calculations of measured energy-loss peaks in the energy region ϳ2.3-3.2 eV differ strongly for CoO, and are sometimes also referred to as quartet-doublet spin-flip transitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations