2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3520372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonant Excitation of Plasma Wakefields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the fixed dispersion, the mask sets the energy modulation period and ultimately the final current modulation, which can be controlled via the incoming chirp and ΞΎ + function of the beamline. It was demonstrated that the technique enables some control over the final temporal period downstream of the dogleg beamline: for ∼ 10 pC modulations with sub-mm periods were produced, consistent with the resonant excitation of wakefield in plasmas (Muggli et al, 2010a). Likewise, this method was extended to produce bunches with triangular beam distribution at the ATF (Shchegolkov et al, 2015) for wakefield excitation in dielectric-lined waveguides (Antipov et al, 2012).…”
Section: Local Coupling Combined With Transverse Maskingmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Given the fixed dispersion, the mask sets the energy modulation period and ultimately the final current modulation, which can be controlled via the incoming chirp and ΞΎ + function of the beamline. It was demonstrated that the technique enables some control over the final temporal period downstream of the dogleg beamline: for ∼ 10 pC modulations with sub-mm periods were produced, consistent with the resonant excitation of wakefield in plasmas (Muggli et al, 2010a). Likewise, this method was extended to produce bunches with triangular beam distribution at the ATF (Shchegolkov et al, 2015) for wakefield excitation in dielectric-lined waveguides (Antipov et al, 2012).…”
Section: Local Coupling Combined With Transverse Maskingmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A single SMI mode can also be excited by a direct density modulation or microbunching of the beam either with a mask [61] or with an inverse free electron laser (IFEL) [62]. A common figure of merit for this microbunching is the bunching factor, which is defined as 𝐡 = exp(π‘–πœƒ 𝑛 )/𝑁 𝑏 , where πœƒ 𝑛 are the longitudinal phases of each particle in the beam at the frequency of the desired accelerating wakefield mode, and 𝑁 𝑏 is the number of particles in the beam [63].…”
Section: Drive Beam Instabilities In Plasma-based Acceleratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%