1978
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2220860216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonant Raman scattering in InP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously scattering intensities of surface phonons are strongly dependent on laser photon energies. Apart from changes in scattering intensities, the eigenfrequencies of the surface and bulk phonon modes increase by about 3-4 cm À1 upon cooling to 50 K. The intensity scales of the spectra have been corrected for the penetration depth of the light [30] and the known resonance behaviour of the bulk TO phonon [8] in order to take into account the apparative response. Since this correction is different for each laser photon energy, the intensities of bulk phonons cannot be compared on an absolute intensity scale before an inverse correction for the penetration depth of light has been done.…”
Section: Raman Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Obviously scattering intensities of surface phonons are strongly dependent on laser photon energies. Apart from changes in scattering intensities, the eigenfrequencies of the surface and bulk phonon modes increase by about 3-4 cm À1 upon cooling to 50 K. The intensity scales of the spectra have been corrected for the penetration depth of the light [30] and the known resonance behaviour of the bulk TO phonon [8] in order to take into account the apparative response. Since this correction is different for each laser photon energy, the intensities of bulk phonons cannot be compared on an absolute intensity scale before an inverse correction for the penetration depth of light has been done.…”
Section: Raman Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result may indicate a vanishing deformation potential D j for the high frequency mode at the surface band gap at 2.80 eV or an anti-resonance due to destructive interference of different scattering contributions. [30] and the known resonance behaviour of the bulk TO phonon [8], in order to take into account the apparative response Both gap modes are going into a strong resonance for photon energies at 3.00 and 3.05 eV. In this spectral range, the RA spectra reveal a surface transition at 2.97 eV.…”
Section: Raman Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A different resonance behaviour for the two gap modes is found, a maximum at 2.81 eV for the lower frequency gap mode and a maximum at 3.00 eV for the higher frequency gap mode. For further analysis the normalized intensities (I s aI TO ) were corrected well for the penetration depth of the light [34] and the known resonance behaviour of the bulk TO phonon [20] in order to take into account the apparative response. In Fig.…”
Section: Resonance Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RRS can be regarded as a form of modulation spectroscopy where the microscopic vibration modulates the electric susceptibility c. For photon energies in the visible range Raman scattering in semiconductors is mediated through electronic interband transitions, thus the Raman tensor elements depend on (dcadw). The scattered intensity can then often (for example for the TO-InP bulk phonon [20]) be written as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%