2010
DOI: 10.1177/0885328210372149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resorbable Glass–Ceramic Phosphate-based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Synthesis, Properties, andIn vitroEffects on Human Marrow Stromal Cells

Abstract: Highly porous bioresorbable glass-ceramic scaffolds were prepared via sponge replication method by using an open-cell polyurethane foam as a template and phosphate-based glass powders. The glass, belonging to the P2O5-SiO2-CaO-MgO-Na2O-K2O system, was synthesized by a melting-quenching route, ground, and sieved to obtain powders with a grain size of less than 30 μm. A slurry containing glass powders, polyvinyl alcohol, and water was prepared to coat the polymeric template. The removal of the polymer and the si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high compressive strength suggests the suitability of S50P3 scaffolds as trabecular coatings for load-bearing prosthetic applications. The fracture energy of S50P3 scaffolds (around 6.5×10 −4 J mm −3 ) is comparable to that assessed for SCNA scaffolds with the same porosity [33], but is significantly higher (more than one order of magnitude) than that of HA [34] and phosphate glass scaffolds [35] reported in the literature. The good in vitro bioactivity of S50P3 scaffolds is demonstrated by the formation of an apatite-like layer on the pore struts (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The high compressive strength suggests the suitability of S50P3 scaffolds as trabecular coatings for load-bearing prosthetic applications. The fracture energy of S50P3 scaffolds (around 6.5×10 −4 J mm −3 ) is comparable to that assessed for SCNA scaffolds with the same porosity [33], but is significantly higher (more than one order of magnitude) than that of HA [34] and phosphate glass scaffolds [35] reported in the literature. The good in vitro bioactivity of S50P3 scaffolds is demonstrated by the formation of an apatite-like layer on the pore struts (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The requirements that an ideal scaffold for bone tissue engineering should fulfill include high porosity (above 50 vol% as in trabecular bone), presence of macropores with size exceeding 100 µm to permit cell migration and scaffold colonization/vascularization, and three-dimensional (3D) interconnectivity of the pore network to allow adequate perfusion of nutrient-rich medium or biological fluids [3][4][5]. When mechanical support is required till healing, scaffold mechanical properties should match those of the specific bone tissue to replace and material degradation rate should also match the kinetics of bone ingrowth [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaffolds compressive strength is above the standard reference range (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) ) considered for human trabecular bone as well as most of foam-like scaffolds with the same porosity reported in the literature [11]; therefore, the produced samples can be proposed even for load-bearing applications like in joint prostheses [13,14]. The fracture energy is from one to two orders of magnitude higher than that reported for other glass-ceramic scaffolds produced by the same method and having analogous macroporous architecture [44,45]; in this regard, a key role is played by the formulation of the starting glass (SCNA) in affecting the sintering behaviour of glass particles and the densification of the scaffold struts.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 72%