1999
DOI: 10.1007/s004420050704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource competition and suppression of plants colonizing early successional old fields

Abstract: Early colonizing annual plants are rapidly suppressed in secondary succession on fertile midwestern old fields, while later colonizing perennials persist. Differences in competitive ability for above- and belowground resources may be partly responsible for differences in species persistence during succession, as both light and nutrient availability may change rapidly. We found that, although both above- and belowground competition suppress growth of colonizing plants, belowground competition was the dominant f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, because C. vulgare generally occurs in disturbed habitats, low vegetation density may decrease the importance of competition in C. vulgare performance. Light competition, which can strongly suppress performance of rosette-forming plants in particular (Wilson 1993), is hypothesized to be low at relatively early successional sites, increasing as succession proceeds (Kosola and Gross 1999). However, the relatively high cover of ambient vegetation at our sites, averaging 65-90%, makes this hypothesis an unlikely explanation for our results.…”
Section: Effects Of Competition Contextmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Second, because C. vulgare generally occurs in disturbed habitats, low vegetation density may decrease the importance of competition in C. vulgare performance. Light competition, which can strongly suppress performance of rosette-forming plants in particular (Wilson 1993), is hypothesized to be low at relatively early successional sites, increasing as succession proceeds (Kosola and Gross 1999). However, the relatively high cover of ambient vegetation at our sites, averaging 65-90%, makes this hypothesis an unlikely explanation for our results.…”
Section: Effects Of Competition Contextmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The proportional increase in grasses and perennials in the aboveground biomass during secondary succession (Montalvo, 1992) have been found in several experiments (Huenneke and Mooney, 1989;Hansson and Hagelfors, 1998;Kosola and Gross, 1999) and are characteristic of the transit to mid-succesional stage.…”
Section: Productivity-diversity Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For the three sites where biomass was sorted into grasses, legumes and non-legume forbs was observed a gradual increase in the contribution of grasses as a result of sowing and temporal development. Such a pattern is commonly found for secondary succession (Kosola and Gross, 1999). Annuals and perennials differ in characteristics related to nutrient retention and turnover, including size, relative growth rate resulting from specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen content (Garnier et al, 1997), rooting depth, root to shoot ratio and foliage C/N ratio (Hooper and Vitousek, 1997).…”
Section: Biodiversity-ecosystem Processesmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contribution of grasses is known to increase as a result of sowing and temporal development when managing grassland communities [21]. The influence of functional group traits on productivity has been reviewed by Díaz and Cabido [22] who found a high number of field studies rather to be correlated to functional group traits than to species diversity.…”
Section: Aboveground Biomass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%