1985
DOI: 10.2307/1444785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Partitioning in Amphibians and Reptiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
302
1
40

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 411 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
11
302
1
40
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that closely related species from different ecological guilds, and distantly related species from the same or different ecological guilds, tend to partition their microhabitat utilization in order to coexist; this was also indicated in previous studies (Schoener, 1974;Toft, 1985;Vitt and Zani, 1996). Species that are closely related tend to partition their microhabitat utilization for them to coexist.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These results indicate that closely related species from different ecological guilds, and distantly related species from the same or different ecological guilds, tend to partition their microhabitat utilization in order to coexist; this was also indicated in previous studies (Schoener, 1974;Toft, 1985;Vitt and Zani, 1996). Species that are closely related tend to partition their microhabitat utilization for them to coexist.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The coexistence of ecologically similar species has been one of the most difficult topics to understand in ecology and has been widely studied in amphibians and reptiles (Toft 1985, Gordon 2000. Biologists have reasoned that there must be at least minimal differences in resource use by similar, co-occuring species to reduce interspecific competition and facilitate coexistence (Pianka 1974, Gordon 2000, Griffin and Silliman 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of ecological studies of Neotropical anuran assemblages, there are important differences in the use of microhabitat, food, and time of activity among sympatric species (Toft 1985, Donnelly and Guyer 1994, Lima and Magnusson 1998, Rossa-Feres and Jim 2001. The differences can be categorized in three niche dimensions: spatial, trophic, and temporal (Schoener 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diferentemente de anuros e lagartos, em que a maioria das espé-cies alimenta-se de artrópodos, as serpentes apresentam dieta muito diversificada (Greene 1997) sendo a dieta um dos principais eixos no nicho deste grupo (Toft 1985). Serpentes são animais carnívoros, que se alimentam de uma ampla variedade de presas, como minhocas, moluscos, onicóforos, aranhas, quilópodos, insetos, crustáceos, peixes, gimnofionos, anuros, lagartos, outras serpentes, tartarugas, crocodilianos, pássaros, ovos, roedores, marsupiais, morcegos (Greene 1997, Martins & Oliveira 1998.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified