2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10764-013-9691-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Use in a Landscape Matrix by an Arboreal Primate: Evidence of Supplementation in Black howlers (Alouatta pigra)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
44
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…caraya : Muhle 2008 ;Prates and Bicca-Marques 2008 ;A. palliata : Pozo-Montuy and Serio-Silva 2007 ;Pozo-Montuy et al 2013 ). For instance, the home range of a group of A. g. clamitans studied by Fortes ( 2008 ) in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul comprised 3 very small fragments (0.2, 0.5 and 1.1 ha) isolated by 35-50 m of grassland that were crossed by the howlers on a daily basis.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Home Range Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…caraya : Muhle 2008 ;Prates and Bicca-Marques 2008 ;A. palliata : Pozo-Montuy and Serio-Silva 2007 ;Pozo-Montuy et al 2013 ). For instance, the home range of a group of A. g. clamitans studied by Fortes ( 2008 ) in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul comprised 3 very small fragments (0.2, 0.5 and 1.1 ha) isolated by 35-50 m of grassland that were crossed by the howlers on a daily basis.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Home Range Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the home range of a group of A. g. clamitans studied by Fortes ( 2008 ) in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul comprised 3 very small fragments (0.2, 0.5 and 1.1 ha) isolated by 35-50 m of grassland that were crossed by the howlers on a daily basis. Similarly, the home range of a group of A. palliata in Tabasco, Mexico, included several trees scattered in a pastureland, to which the howlers traveled regularly to feed on fruits (Pozo-Montuy et al 2013 ). The costs of adopting this strategy are illustrated by 2 events of predation, 1 by a coyote (Pozo-Montuy and Serio-Silva 2007 , 499 h of observation) and the other by a domestic dog (V.B.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Home Range Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of forest fragmentation, there are several hypotheses. First, travel routes can be limited, bringing individuals into greater contact with contaminated foliage or forcing them onto the ground where they are more likely to come into contact with soil-transmitted pathogens [Stoner, 1996;Gillespie et al, 2005;Trejo-Macías et al, 2007;Mbora and McPeek, 2009;Pozo-Montuy et al, 2013]. Groups may also be forced into smaller areas, thereby increasing density, contact rates and subsequent parasite exposure [Stoner, 1996;Nunn et al, 2003;Gillespie et al, 2005;Vitazkova and Wade, 2007;Wells et al, 2007;Mbora and McPeek, 2009;Arroyo-Rodriguez and Dias, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pressures can exacerbate the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on primate species, depending on species' life history traits. For example, the large space requirement of some large bodied primate species living in large groups at times has been overcome by utilising crops and urban resources as part of their diet Pozo-Montuy et al 2012;CampbellSmith et al 2012). In addition, some traits such as large body size and diet specialization seem to make species with these traits more sensitive to other concomitant and anthropogenic pressures such as selective logging and hunting (Peres 1999;Chapman et al 2010).…”
Section: Rodriguez Et Al 2013a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The priority conservation areas identified in the prioritising process in chapter 5, need to incorporate an expert and stakeholder consultation process to assess the benefits of the priority areas selected. 24 4, 5, 12, 14, 15, 30, 50, 68, 78, 88, 91, 104, 108, 115, 130 9, 10, 15, 36, 39, 79, 92, 110, 128 13, 25 25 13, 25 Distance to nearest town 38 43, 78, 115 Patch shape 123 38 4, 78, 88, 91, 123 110 Forest Cover 123 119 4, 5, 69, 88, 123, 133 110 Edge density 123 123 Mean inter-patch isolation distance 123 123 Number of forest patches 123 4,88,110 Matrix 3,31,54,123 3,5,7,14,26,123,129,6,9,10 58,120 58,120 Appendice C. Additional graphics of all the response variables studied across traits. library (rjags) library (coda) library (snowfall) library ( idx_z <-idx_z + 1…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%