1994
DOI: 10.1006/faat.1994.1093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory Allergy: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no conclusive evidence that animal models can predict the sensitizing potential of chemicals in humans (1,29). There is a reasonable agreement between the results from the present rat model and epidemiologic studies of exposed workers.…”
Section: Statisticssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there is no conclusive evidence that animal models can predict the sensitizing potential of chemicals in humans (1,29). There is a reasonable agreement between the results from the present rat model and epidemiologic studies of exposed workers.…”
Section: Statisticssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Thus interest in predictive testing of allergenicity (1,2) and in quantitative structureactivity relationships (3-6) is growing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, occupational exposure to nonallergenic agents may also influence IgE sensitization, e.g. to common aeroallergens, and atopies arc more susceptible to allergic mani festations in the presence of irritating agents [15,16], Nassif et al [17] reported that the skin of atopies is generally asso ciated with a lowered threshold o f irritant responsiveness towards sodium lauryl sulfate. In the present study we used neutrophils from nonatopic donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that the potential of chemicals to cause immunological sensitisation depends on their mode of interaction with antigen-presenting cells and the subject9s subsequent lymphocyte responses, and since antigen-presenting cells and lymphocytes are not confined to the skin, there is no a priori reason to assume that the dermal route of administration is critical in eliciting a sensitisation response. Arguably, chemicals that are positive in tests involving dermal application should be considered as sensitisers regardless of their mode of contact with the body, including through inhalation [20]. This is contentious, and further research into the relationship between dermal and respiratory sensitisation is required.…”
Section: Preproduct Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%