2002
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory cancer and exposure to man‐made vitreous fibers: A systematic review

Abstract: The results highlight the difficulty of assessing small increases in risk of respiratory cancer potentially caused by occupational exposure in populations with high prevalence of tobacco use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, male subjects exposed to MMVFs exhibited an increased, though not significant, lung cancer risk. The risks estimated in our study were higher than those reported by a meta-analysis indicating that glass and rock wool exposure is associated with lung cancer [Berrigan, 2002]. We also evaluated whether our findings could have been produced by the presence of asbestos exposure in the same subjects.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…In our study, male subjects exposed to MMVFs exhibited an increased, though not significant, lung cancer risk. The risks estimated in our study were higher than those reported by a meta-analysis indicating that glass and rock wool exposure is associated with lung cancer [Berrigan, 2002]. We also evaluated whether our findings could have been produced by the presence of asbestos exposure in the same subjects.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…These results parallel those of a meta-analysis published in 2002 and other reviews published around the same time. 1,4,15 Because risk estimates in industrybased studies are usually based on comparison with an external population, uncontrolled confounding is virtually impossible to exclude with any level of confidence. 46 Community-based studies of case-control design, on the other hand, are likely to suffer from bias (eg, from selection of cases or controls, retrospective assessment, and absence of validation of exposure), from low-reported prevalence of exposures of interest or jobs related to such exposures, and from residual confounding (eg, by other occupational exposures).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We retrieved and assessed potentially relevant articles, and checked the lists of references to identify additional candidate studies. We also examined recent reviews 1,4,14,15 for relevant data or information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metaanálisis llevados a cabo por Berrigan y col. (2002) y Lipwort y col. (2009), encontraron un discreto aumento del riesgo para cáncer de pulmón en trabajadores expuestos a lanas de escoria y cáncer de pulmón, aunque en ambos estudios concluyeron que este ligero incremento podía encontrarse más ligado al consumo de tabaco o a exposiciones al amianto de forma independiente o simultánea 45,46 . En resumen, la mayoría de autores consideran que no existe evidencia suficiente para atribuir una asociación causal entre exposición a lanas de vidrio y lanas de roca y el cáncer de pulmón ni para el mesotelioma 47 .…”
Section: Lanas De Roca Y Lanas De Escoria Y Cáncer De Pulmónunclassified