Respiratory energy costs for the maintenance of biomass, for growth and for ion uptake in roots of Carex diandra and Carex acutiformis

Abstract

Respiratory energy costs for the maintenance of biomass, for growth and for ion uptake in roots of Carex diandra and Carex acutiformis. -Physiol. Plant. 72: 483491.The respiratory characteristics of the roots of Carex diandra Schrank and Carex acutiformis Ehrh. were investigated. The aims were, firstly to determine the respiratory energy costs for the maintenance of root biomass, for root growth and for ion uptake, and secondly to explain the higher rate of root respiration and ATP production in C. diandra. The three respiratory energy components were derived from a multiple regression analysis, using the relative growth rate and the net rate of nitrate uptake as independent variables and the rate of ATP production as a dependent variable. Although the rate of root respiration and ATP production was significantly higher in C. diandra than in C. acutiformis, the two species showed no significant difference in their rate of ATP production for the maintenance of biomass, in the respiratory energy coefficient for growth (the amount of ATP production per unit of biomass produced) and the respiratory energy coefficient for ion uptake (amount of ATP production per unit of ions absorbed). It is concluded that the higher rate of root respiration of C. diandra is caused by a higher rate of nitrate uptake. At relatively high rates of growth and nitrate uptake, the contribution of the rate of ATP production for ion uptake to the total rate of ATP production amounted to 38 and 25% for C. diandra and C. acutiformis, respectively. At this growth rate, the respiratory energy production for growth contributed 37 and 50%, respectively, to the total rate of ATP production. The relative contribution of the rate of ATP production for the maintenance of biomass increased from 25 to 70% with increasing plant age for both species. The results suggest that ion uptake is one of the major sinks for respiratory energy in roots. These experimentally derived values for the rate of ATP production for the maintenance of biomass, the respiratory energy coefficient for growth and the respiratory energy coefficient for ion uptake are discussed in relation to other experimentally and theoretically derived values. A. van der werf (corresponding author) et al.,

Comparison of allelopathic effects of some brassica species in two growth stages on germination and growth of sunflower

“…A great decrease in ATP/ADP level and energy charge was detected in Sinapis alba seeds treated by sunflower leaf allelochemicals (Bogatek et al 2002). Ion uptake and growth are the most energy-consuming processes in plant cells (Van der Werf et al 1988). Inhibition of seedling growth in allelopathy stress conditions may be therefore a result of decreased ion uptake.…”

Spatial and temporal deployment of crop roots in CO2‐enriched environments

“…60 d of root maintenance in unfavorable conditions would cost as much as one cycle of root death followed by regrowth. Van der Werf et al (1988) showed, for a different species, that the ATP costs of producing 1 g f. wt of root is approximately equal to the cost of maintaining 1 g of root for 10 d. It might therefore actually be more energetically expensive to maintain fine roots when the costs of maintenance during periods of stress exceed the costs of constructing new roots upon the return of more favorable soil conditions.…”

Reduction in Root Secondary Growth as a Strategy for Phosphorus Acquisition

“…Although increasing resource allocation to root growth improves P acquisition, unbalanced root development reduces overall plant growth due to the increased metabolic cost of added root tissue (Nielsen et al, 1998(Nielsen et al, , 2001Lambers et al, 2006). Over 50% of daily carbon fixation may be consumed by the root system, with P-stressed plants allocating a larger fraction of their daytime net carbon assimilation than nonstressed plants (Van Der Werf et al, 1988;Lambers et al, 1996;Nielsen et al, 1998Nielsen et al, , 2001). This cost consists of three main components: the growth of new root tissue, ion uptake and assimilation, and the maintenance of existing root tissue (Nielsen et al, 1998;Fan et al, 2003).…”