2020
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1626/1/012022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory Motion Prediction with Random Vector Functional Link (RVFL) Based Neural Networks

Abstract: Respiratory motion exhibits non-linear and non-stationary behavior in nature and this has been a great hindrance to the accurate prediction of tumor in motion adaptive radiotherapy. Accurate prediction of respiratory motion and subsequent tracking of tumor has been a challenge due to the irregularities and intra-trace variabilities. In order to overcome this issue, prediction models can be trained by using neural networks. However due to the burden of large training data, computational efficacy of existing neu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in [49], several scientific questions were addressed, such as the relationship between the performance of the RVFL model and the rank of the input dataset, the sensitivity of this relationship with the different types of activation function, and the number of hidden nodes, respectively and many more. Rasheed et al [50] implemented standard RVFL with different activation functions into the respiratory motion prediction and compared RVFL with direct and without direct links. The authors find out that the results with hardlim activation function are better than results with sigmoid, sine, tribas, radbas and sign functions, and direct links prevent RVFL from overfitting.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluation Of Rvfl For Classification and Regressi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in [49], several scientific questions were addressed, such as the relationship between the performance of the RVFL model and the rank of the input dataset, the sensitivity of this relationship with the different types of activation function, and the number of hidden nodes, respectively and many more. Rasheed et al [50] implemented standard RVFL with different activation functions into the respiratory motion prediction and compared RVFL with direct and without direct links. The authors find out that the results with hardlim activation function are better than results with sigmoid, sine, tribas, radbas and sign functions, and direct links prevent RVFL from overfitting.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluation Of Rvfl For Classification and Regressi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An independently developed method, the single hidden layer neural network with random weights (RWSLFN), was reported in [29], differing from RVFL by excluding the direct links. Research has shown that the direct links significantly enhances RVFL's performance, especially in time series forecasting [27,[30][31][32][33]. In [16,31,33], the authors clearly demonstrated that the presence of the direct links in RVFL help to regularize the randomization and reduce the model complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that the direct links significantly enhances RVFL's performance, especially in time series forecasting [27,[30][31][32][33]. In [16,31,33], the authors clearly demonstrated that the presence of the direct links in RVFL help to regularize the randomization and reduce the model complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, model-free methods, alternatively, do not formulate any specific model for motion characteristics, as an alternative to forecast the location by taking into account the preceding observations. Existing model-free approaches include support vector regression (SVR) [10,11], relevance vector machines (RVM) [12,13], extreme learning machine (ELM) [14][15][16][17][18], random vector functional link (RVFL) [19], convolution neural network (CNN) [20], long short-term memory (LSTM) [21][22][23], and forecasting random convolution node (fRCN) [24]. A recent comprehensive evaluation of existing approaches [7] reveals that model-free approaches predict respiratory motion with greater robustness and less prediction error than model-based counterparts, as a result, yielding improved prediction performance, especially at larger prediction lengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This architectural choice enhances its overall generalization capabilities and significantly accelerates the learning speed. The effectiveness of these direct links within the RVFL network has been showcased across various domains, including time-series prediction [37,42], function approximation [43], as well as classification and regression tasks [19,[44][45][46]. In our prior studies [19], RVFL was employed on respiratory motion for multi-step ahead prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%