2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responding to the coffee crisis: What can we learn from price dynamics?

Abstract: An econometric model of coffee price dynamics is specified and estimated to capture the evolution of coffee prices at the farm, wholesale and retail levels. It investigates the historical influence of the International Coffee Agreement (ICA) through its effects on yield and planting decisions. In the short run, the ICA caused Brazilian farm prices to become disconnected from international prices. The ICA helped coffee producers to better incorporate current world price information into planting decisions. This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are differing views on their impact on producer welfare, the interventions are in general regarded as unsuccessful. The cost of achieving reduced volatility seemed too high, given that the administered prices usually were far below the certainty equivalent level that would be accepted by producers (Raffaeli, 1995;Hamza and Azenaw, 1995;Bohman, Jarvis and Barichello, 1996;Gilbert, 1999;McIntire and Varangis, 1999;Krivonos, 2004;Jarvis, 2005;Boudreaux, 2007;Mehta and Chavas, 2008;Mohan, 2010;Russell, Mohan and Banerjee, 2012). Therefore, how best to manage the negative consequences of price volatility for producers is a key issue for governments and policy makers.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are differing views on their impact on producer welfare, the interventions are in general regarded as unsuccessful. The cost of achieving reduced volatility seemed too high, given that the administered prices usually were far below the certainty equivalent level that would be accepted by producers (Raffaeli, 1995;Hamza and Azenaw, 1995;Bohman, Jarvis and Barichello, 1996;Gilbert, 1999;McIntire and Varangis, 1999;Krivonos, 2004;Jarvis, 2005;Boudreaux, 2007;Mehta and Chavas, 2008;Mohan, 2010;Russell, Mohan and Banerjee, 2012). Therefore, how best to manage the negative consequences of price volatility for producers is a key issue for governments and policy makers.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A long line of research seeks to understand the price dynamics of commodities in general and softs in particular-see, for example, Mehta & Chavas (2008) and Igami (2015) in the case of coffee and see Cafiero, Bobenrieth, Bobenrieth, & Wright (2015) in the case of sugar. The present paper is, to our knowledge, the first to systematically investigate factors related to market expectations of future softs price volatility.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A long line of research seeks to understand the price dynamics of commodities in general and softs in particular -see, e.g., Mehta and Chavas (2008) and Igami (2015) in the case of coffee and see Cafiero, Bobenrieth, Bobenrieth, and Wright (2015) in the case of sugar. The present paper is, to our knowledge, the first to systematically investigate the factors related to market expectations of softs price volatility expectations.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%