1971
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112071001162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response behaviour of hot wires in shear flow

Abstract: The response characteristics of a hot wire operated at constant temperature and exposed to a mean-velocity gradient along its length are examined both analytically and experimentally. The shear sensitivity of local wire temperature distributions, as measured with an infrared microscope, are compared with predicted temperature distributions in order to select a convective heat transfer correlation which can be applied locally along a wire in shear flow. On the basis of this correlation, the steady-state and dyn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Errors could also arise when measuring with crossed wires in shear layers due to the finite sensor volume. Gessner & Moller (1971) proposed a shear parameter S = ( U /U cl )(d/ l), where U is the velocity change along the length of the wire, and U cl is the velocity at the centre of the wire. In the current experiments S < 2.90 × 10 −4 , and since this is considerably less than the critical value of 10 −3 suggested by Lomas (1986), errors due to mean shear effects were negligible.…”
Section: Angle Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors could also arise when measuring with crossed wires in shear layers due to the finite sensor volume. Gessner & Moller (1971) proposed a shear parameter S = ( U /U cl )(d/ l), where U is the velocity change along the length of the wire, and U cl is the velocity at the centre of the wire. In the current experiments S < 2.90 × 10 −4 , and since this is considerably less than the critical value of 10 −3 suggested by Lomas (1986), errors due to mean shear effects were negligible.…”
Section: Angle Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three-wire heat flux probe consisted of two 2.5 µm platinum-coated tungsten hot wires separated by 0.35 mm in a cross-wire formation with a 2.5 µm cold wire placed 0.55 mm upstream of the geometric centre of the cross-wire and perpendicular to the plane of measurement of the cross-wire. The size parameters were chosen following design criteria given in the literature (Wyngaard 1968;Guitton & Patel 1969;Gessner & Moller 1971;Strohl & Comte-Bellot 1973;Nakayama & Westphal 1986;Blair & Bennett 1987;Ligrani & Bradshaw 1987a, b) and following a similar design to that used by Littell & Eaton for their cross-wires. This was done to achieve the best resolution while still measuring temperature and velocity without interference effects.…”
Section: Facility and Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smallest wall distance in these measurements was y = 1.5mm, though the results were expected to be impaired by mean-velocity gradients in the vicinity of the wall (see e.g. Gessner & Moller 1971;Sandborn 1976).…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Measurement Techniquementioning
confidence: 90%