2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0320(20000701)40:3<198::aid-cyto4>3.0.co;2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response in shape and size of individual p31 cancer cells to cisplatin and ouabain: a computerized image analysis of cell halo characteristics during continuous perfusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The halo artefact, which is accentuated by phase contrast techniques, is known to interfere with further image processing, but may also simplify the detection of cell walls by enhancing boundaries between the targeted specimen and medium . Segmentation of the halo and cell may be achieved using an intensity threshold method . The underlying assumption of the intensity threshold method is that cells have significantly and consistently different intensities than the background.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The halo artefact, which is accentuated by phase contrast techniques, is known to interfere with further image processing, but may also simplify the detection of cell walls by enhancing boundaries between the targeted specimen and medium . Segmentation of the halo and cell may be achieved using an intensity threshold method . The underlying assumption of the intensity threshold method is that cells have significantly and consistently different intensities than the background.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique has been used in previous reports regarding EMP cytotoxicity (Engstrom et al 1991;Behnam-Motlagh et al 1997;Behnam-Motlagh et al 2000). In short, we used a special type of microperifusion chamber consisting of glass slides forming a compartment in which cancer cells could be perifused.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used of which is form factor (Berezin et al ., ; Soll et al ., ; Lepekhin et al ., ) also called circularity (Schneider et al ., ) or compactness (Metzler et al ., ), being a ratio between the area and the square of the perimeter, as shown in Table . Sometimes it is inappropriately used with its reciprocal, roundness (Behnam‐Motlagh et al ., ). Both descriptors are rotation invariant and size‐independent indicators of the degree of cell circularity and shape irregularities.…”
Section: Morphometric Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most commonly used of which is form factor Soll et al, 1988;Lepekhin et al, 2001) also called circularity (Schneider et al, 2012) or compactness (Metzler et al, 2000), being a ratio between the area and the square of the perimeter, as shown in Table 1. Sometimes it is inappropriately used with its reciprocal, roundness (Behnam-Motlagh et al, 2000). Both descriptors are rotation invariant and size-independent indicators of the degree of cell circularity and shape ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi…”
Section: Simple Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%