1984
DOI: 10.2307/2388057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of a Dung Beetle Guild to Different Sizes of Dung Bait in a Panamanian Rainforest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
1
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
81
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Peck & Howden (1984) stated that larger baits attracted an order of magnitude more beetles, of nearly double the mean size, than smaller baits. Their fi nding that larger baits attracted more beetles was corroborated by a key fi nding of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Peck & Howden (1984) stated that larger baits attracted an order of magnitude more beetles, of nearly double the mean size, than smaller baits. Their fi nding that larger baits attracted more beetles was corroborated by a key fi nding of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause for this relationship is probably due, in part, to the fact that larger dung piles attract more dung beetles than do smaller dung piles (Andresen 2000, Peck & Howden 1984. Beetle size may also be of importance.…”
Section: Amount Of Dungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include topography and climate (Kirk and Ridsdill-Smith 1986, Davis and Dewhurst 1993, Davis 1997, edaphic characteristics and vegetative physiognomy (Nealis 1977, Cambefort 1982, Davis 1996, dung type (Fincher et al 1970, Davis 1994, Tshikae et al 2008, dropping size (Peck and Howden 1984), and spatial frequency of droppings (Lobo et al 2006). The relative inßuence of these factors varies both with spatial scale and the speciÞc attributes of a geographical region, landscape, or locality .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%