1986
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290140606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion

Abstract: SUMMARYA method to obtain the dynamic response of an extended rigid foundation supported on an elastic half-space when subjected to a spatially varying ground motion including both random and deterministic effects is presented. The method relies on an integral representation of the response of the foundation in terms of the free-field ground motion. Numerical results for a rigid square foundation and for a ground motion characterized by a particular spatial coherence function are described. The results obtaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
170
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(12 reference statements)
3
170
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, forced vibration-based techniques based on impedance function determination in situ (Luco and Wong, 1986) that have allowed the identification of impedance and Poisson's ratios of soil profiles have been shown to yield erratic and unrealistic attenuation values. Compared to noninvasive field investigation techniques, attenuation values obtained using in situ borehole recordings may provide critical constrains on the physical mechanisms of energy absorption and redistribution in the near surface due to the minimization of uncertainty introduced in the inversion forward operator by the a priori knowledge of the total wave field at the borehole level of the site under investigation.…”
Section: Stochastic Seismogram Inversion Algorithm With Deterministicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, forced vibration-based techniques based on impedance function determination in situ (Luco and Wong, 1986) that have allowed the identification of impedance and Poisson's ratios of soil profiles have been shown to yield erratic and unrealistic attenuation values. Compared to noninvasive field investigation techniques, attenuation values obtained using in situ borehole recordings may provide critical constrains on the physical mechanisms of energy absorption and redistribution in the near surface due to the minimization of uncertainty introduced in the inversion forward operator by the a priori knowledge of the total wave field at the borehole level of the site under investigation.…”
Section: Stochastic Seismogram Inversion Algorithm With Deterministicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each position, the displacement histories change as the seismic wave propagates and changes its characteristics [6,7,11,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. These positions were chosen to consider accelerometric signals at the bridge foundations which have differences due to: (i) the distance among the generation points and (ii) the local site effects due to the soil characteristics below each generation point.…”
Section: Asynchronous and Synchronous Actions On The Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generation procedure [6,7,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] used to obtain the input displacement histories at the bridge foundation points was discussed in Lavorato et al [11]. This procedure was implemented in MATLAB [38] as a framework of functions named GAS 2.0 -Generation of Asynchronous Signals -.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acceleration time histories are obtained by the procedure presented in [18,19], which relies on the spectral representation method by Shinozuka [20]. At the structuresoil contact points the auto-spectrum of the generated accelerations satisfy the well known KanaiTajimi Power Spectral Density (PSD) as modified by Clough and Penzien [21], while the crossspectra between the motions at different stations are derived from the coherency function proposed by Luco and Wong [22]. In the case at hand, a velocity of the shear waves v s = 3000 m/s and an incoherency factor α = 0.2 were adopted.…”
Section: Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%