1986
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4238(86)90038-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of apricot seedling lines to waterlogging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Progress also has been made in discerning useful variability in newer cherry germplasm (Roth and Gruppe, 1985;Beckman, 1988). Given the progress in the identification and development of germplasm, along with necessary methodologies (Rowe and Catlin, 1971;Mizutani et al, 1982;Stassen and Van Zyl, 1982;Andersen et al, 1984;Hassan et al, 1986;Beckman, 1988;Alvino and Zerbi, 1989;Ranney, 1994), waterlogging tolerance appears to be a mature area that is now an ongoing priority of several programs. 4.…”
Section: Insect Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress also has been made in discerning useful variability in newer cherry germplasm (Roth and Gruppe, 1985;Beckman, 1988). Given the progress in the identification and development of germplasm, along with necessary methodologies (Rowe and Catlin, 1971;Mizutani et al, 1982;Stassen and Van Zyl, 1982;Andersen et al, 1984;Hassan et al, 1986;Beckman, 1988;Alvino and Zerbi, 1989;Ranney, 1994), waterlogging tolerance appears to be a mature area that is now an ongoing priority of several programs. 4.…”
Section: Insect Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details on the experimental technique are described elsewhere. 23 Time of appearance of waterlogging symptoms and percentage of survived seedlings were recorded and the affected seedlings were daily removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 Auxin and ethylene concentration increased in waterlogged plants. 23,41 However, the effect of waterlogging on epinastic leaf angle differed with specie (Table 3). Seedling of C.cunninghamiana which was the most tolerant species to waterlogging had the lowest effect of waterlogging on epinastic leaf angle, However epinastic leaf angle of E. citrodora, the least waterlogging tolerance was the most influenced by waterlogging.…”
Section: Leaf Angle (Epinasty)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of cherry rootstocks with less susceptibility to bacterial canker is of interest worldwide, but has been, as yet, rarely practiced, presumably due to few good choices. While 'F.12/1', 'Colt', and the MxM series have been reported to have somewhat reduced susceptibility, only 'Charger' (P. avium) has been noted to be "resistant" [104][105][106]. The development of lab screening tests by Krzesinska, et al, Bedford, et al [107,108] should help speed identification of further sources of resistance in cherry.…”
Section: Lesion (Pratylenchus Spp)mentioning
confidence: 99%