2015
DOI: 10.5958/2394-4471.2015.00018.0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) genotypes under different planting geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…more number of primary and secondary branches and leaf area. Literature showed that mustard crop geometry of 45 cm row to row and 15 cm plant to plant resulted into more number of branches/plant (Mirza et al 2008;Paraye et al 2009, Pandey et al 2015, crop growth rate (CGR) and above ground dry biomass accumulation (Tyagi and Upadhyay 2016). Mustard Planter sown crop retained more chlorophyll and leaf relative water content might be due more water allocation to the plants at optimum population, and favourable land configuration facilitated more light interception, less transpiration and less evaporation due to soil mulch (Singh et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…more number of primary and secondary branches and leaf area. Literature showed that mustard crop geometry of 45 cm row to row and 15 cm plant to plant resulted into more number of branches/plant (Mirza et al 2008;Paraye et al 2009, Pandey et al 2015, crop growth rate (CGR) and above ground dry biomass accumulation (Tyagi and Upadhyay 2016). Mustard Planter sown crop retained more chlorophyll and leaf relative water content might be due more water allocation to the plants at optimum population, and favourable land configuration facilitated more light interception, less transpiration and less evaporation due to soil mulch (Singh et al 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest secondary branches per plant were found in 15 cm row spacing. Pandey et al, (2015) in a field experiment had also reported that the number of secondary branches was recorded significantly higher with crop geometry of 45cm x 15cm as compared to other crop geometries. Varieties and the interaction effect of plant geometry and varieties on primary branches per plant were found to be nonsignificant.…”
Section: Secondary Branches Per Plantmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Wider row spacing of 45 cm recorded significantly taller plants than narrow row spacing of 15 cm and it was at par with 30 cm row spacing. Pandey et al, (2015) had also reported that the plant height was significantly higher with crop geometry of 45cm x 15cm as compared to other crop geometries. The plant height was not significantly influenced by varieties and interaction of varieties and plant geometry.…”
Section: Plant Heightmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the increased population in narrow crop geometry, plants probably tended to be taller for getting light, which may result in increased plant height. Pandey et al (2015) and Singh et al (2019) also reported higher plant height with narrow spacing under transplanted Indian mustard. Among the different spacing, 60 cm × 45 cm accumulated significantly more dry-matter than rest of spacings owing to better growth and development of the individual plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%