Response of microbial organisms (aquatic and terrestrial) to pesticides

Abstract

A systematic literature search was carried out in order to assess the response of microbial organisms to pesticides in aquatic and terrestrial environments. The major literature databases have been interrogated, and after a refinement of keywords, thousands of records were retrieved and manually screened for relevance, quality, publication date, language and suitability for quantitative metaanalyses. 234 records for the terrestrial lot and 42 records for the aquatic lot were retained after screening and analysed for the extraction of several relevant information regarding the type of study, the pesticide application dose, the microbial parameters measured. From each record, a number of case studies were extracted, a case study being represented by the measurement of a single product, at a specific dose on a specific microbiological endpoint. A high number of case studies (3405 for terrestrial and 458 for aquatic) were obtained, stored and analysed through an Access database query system. With such a query system, it was possible to show on a detailed semi-quantitative way that pesticides affect microbes in a number of ways, with significant reductions in microbiological endpoints of biomass and activity detected in less than half of the cases considered. Furthermore, a number of temporary effects were identified, with microbial endpoints being firstly affected and then restored to the original conditions. This report confirms on one hand the complexity of microbial parameters in terrestrial and aquatic environments, on the other the importance of considering carefully microbial features in the risk assessment of pesticides. In this context, the adoption of a macro-categorization of microbial responses (biomass, activity and structure) can be useful for handling complex data and to identify patterns that can be potentially used for the goal of protecting microorganisms from potential adverse effects of pesticides. Carrying out risk assessment for nontarget microbes on single molecules, as usually done for the risk assessment of pesticides, will be very important in order to identify which ones are eventually causing more detrimental effects. The literature survey also indicated that the pesticide applied dose strongly affect the outcomes, with less impacts when the pesticides are being applied at recommended field doses: it is thus recommended to further promote policies for use of pesticides according to good agricultural practices, since this can reduce side-effects on non-target soil microorganisms. KEY WORDSpesticides -terrestrial environments -aquatic environments -microbial activity -microbial biomass -microbial community structure DISCLAIMERThe present document has been produced and adopted by the bodies identified above as author(s). This task has been carried out exclusively by the author(s) in the context of a contract between the European Food Safety Authority and the author(s), awarded following a tender procedure. The present The present document has been produced and adopted by the bodies id...

Lab to Field Assessment of the Ecotoxicological Impact of Chlorpyrifos, Isoproturon, or Tebuconazole on the Diversity and Composition of the Soil Bacterial Community

“…They are intentionally applied in conventional agriculture to protect crops from various pests. They can persist in soil, and from there they can be dispersed to other environmental compartments (Looser et al, 2000 ; Barbash, 2003 ; Smalling et al, 2013 ), and can harm non-target organisms (Pimentel, 1995 ; Zhang et al, 2011 ) including soil microorganisms as summarized by Puglisi ( 2012 ). The preservation of the soil bacterial diversity is important as it largely contributes to crucial ecosystem functions.…”

Responses of Limagne “Clay/Organic Matter-Rich” Soil Microbial Communities to Realistic Formulated Herbicide Mixtures, Including S-Metolachlor, Mesotrione, and Nicosulfuron

“…Indeed, it is now apparent that soil organisms play an important role in the cycle of nutrients due to their involvement in the geochemical cycles (Lemanceau et al 2015). Exhaustive reviews, dealing with relationships between soil microbial community impact and the use of a single pesticide, underlined the fact that those chemicals applied at recommended field rates could exert only minor or transient effects on the functioning of soil system (Lo 2010;Puglisi 2012). Nevertheless, the reappraisal of many first-generation chemicals (by Water and Soil Framework directives, biocide directive 98/8/EC and REACH) led to their replacement by a new generation of chemicals with lower agronomic doses that are supposed to be less dangerous for the environment.…”

The hidden effects of agrochemicals on plant metabolism and root-associated microorganisms

“…It is interesting to note that these previous clues are 3 perfectly in agreement with the distinct and profound changes at the metabolome level detected in 3 our work. In this regard, it is worth noting that the three pesticides here used (either tebuconazole, The large majority of the cases, the effects on the microbial communities caused by chemical inputs 3 include a change in biodiversity and community structure, together with biomass abundance 3 (Puglisi, 2017). Considering the agrochemicals analyzed in our work, tebuconazole and Cycoń and Piotrowska-Seget, 2015;Mahapatra et al, 2017;Storck et al, 2018), while no changes or only transient modifications in the soil microbial communities have been reported for glyphosate (Weaver et al, 2007;Mijangos et al, 2009;Dennis et al, 2018).…”