2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of pore water Al, Fe and S concentrations to waterlogging in a boreal acid sulphate soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These decreases also matched up with the decreases in plant tissue Al observed in the treated seep soils, indicating that the amendments did reduce both mobility and bioavailability, as was the aim. The soil solution Al concentrations observed in the untreated seeps was highest (154 mg/L) in seep 1, with the values being similar to those observed in the subsoil of acid sulfate soils (pH 3.8–4.2) in Finland (e.g., 113–159 mg/L; Virtanen et al 2014). The successful reduction of the soil solution Al concentrations observed following treatment, particularly with Fe‐WTRs, might suggest that acid sulfate soil remediation measures could also benefit from incorporating addition of Fe‐WTRs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These decreases also matched up with the decreases in plant tissue Al observed in the treated seep soils, indicating that the amendments did reduce both mobility and bioavailability, as was the aim. The soil solution Al concentrations observed in the untreated seeps was highest (154 mg/L) in seep 1, with the values being similar to those observed in the subsoil of acid sulfate soils (pH 3.8–4.2) in Finland (e.g., 113–159 mg/L; Virtanen et al 2014). The successful reduction of the soil solution Al concentrations observed following treatment, particularly with Fe‐WTRs, might suggest that acid sulfate soil remediation measures could also benefit from incorporating addition of Fe‐WTRs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…All water samples were preserved by adding ultrapure nitric acid (solution pH b 2.0) in order to maintain the same matrix and stored at +5°C for the elemental analysis. The concentrations of Al, Fe and S (as well as Ca, Mg, Mn, Na, K; results not presented but used in PHREEQC modelling) were measured by ICP-OES, Cl was determined coulometrically (Chloride Analyser 926, Sherwood Scientific, UK) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC pw ) was analysed using an infrared gas analyser (TOC-V CPH/CPN, Shimadzu) (analyses are described in more detail in Virtanen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Chemical Analysis Of Water Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a necessary trace element in body, Fe 3+ plays a significant role in a lot of physiological metabolic processes, such as syntheses of hemoglobin, gene expression, neurotransmission, regulation of metalloenzymes, oxygen metabolism, and electron transfer . Despite all this, superfluous levels of Fe 3+ biological body is possible to increase occurrence rates of Fe 3+ ‐related diseases containing cancer, metabolism dysfunction, cardiopathy, hepatopathy, and so on .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%