2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of soil physical properties to tillage and residue management on two soils in a cool temperate environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
71
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
14
71
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Shortly before tillage (sampling date 1), the mean penetration resistance at the three depths studied was higher than the 3.2 MPa limit in treatments T1 (3.34 MPa) and T2 (3.25 MPa) but not in T3 (3.13 MPa). Our results were not consistent with those of other studies that have reported greater soil penetration with no-tillage and reduced tillage compared with conventional tillage (Carter et al, 2002;Singh & Malhi, 2006). However, other authors have not observed differences between tillage systems (Kirkegaard et al, 1994).…”
Section: Soil Penetration Resistancecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Shortly before tillage (sampling date 1), the mean penetration resistance at the three depths studied was higher than the 3.2 MPa limit in treatments T1 (3.34 MPa) and T2 (3.25 MPa) but not in T3 (3.13 MPa). Our results were not consistent with those of other studies that have reported greater soil penetration with no-tillage and reduced tillage compared with conventional tillage (Carter et al, 2002;Singh & Malhi, 2006). However, other authors have not observed differences between tillage systems (Kirkegaard et al, 1994).…”
Section: Soil Penetration Resistancecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Soil PR values exceeding 2000 kPa are associated with restricted root growth (Singh and Malhi, 2006). Busscher et al (2010Busscher et al ( , 2011 showed the application of 44 Mg ha -1 of pecan shell-derived biochar (2% dwb) to decrease the PR (measured at θ =10%) of a fine loamy sand from 2.9 to 1.18 MPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yield response of crops to N at these sites would support these statements, and therefore, the increase organic in C and N in soil, especially LFOC and LFON, was most likely due to the increase in crop yield with N fertilization, returning more organic C and/or N to the soil at higher N rates through crop residue including straw, chaff (Campbell et al, 1991;Nyborg et al, 1995;Malhi et al, 2006;Malhi & Lemke, 2007) and root mass (Lorenz, 1977;Malhi & Gill, 2002). The lower mass of soil C and N with S Rem than S Ret suggests that the practice of removing straw from fields for on-farm and industrial uses or to facilitate seeding operations may, in the long run, result in soil degradation or deterioration related to physical, chemical or biological properties, especially under CT Singh & Malhi, 2006). In the present study, the comparisons between S Rem and S Ret treatments were made only at the zero-N rate, and probably the increase in organic C and N may have been much greater if N fertilizer was used in these treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%