2008
DOI: 10.1134/s0016793208040129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of the nighttime midlatitude ionosphere to the passage of an atmospheric gravity wave

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…compression of the layer from the top down followed by a recovering expansion of the profile. The stated relationship between these parameters described here is in full agreement with the previous experimental results of Ashkaliev et al [2003], Yakovets et al [2008], and Yakovets et al [2013]. As was pointed out by Ashkaliev et al [2003], these observations are also consistent with the theoretical calculations of TID relationships provided by Millward et al [1993, Figure 6].…”
Section: 1002/2016rs006036supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…compression of the layer from the top down followed by a recovering expansion of the profile. The stated relationship between these parameters described here is in full agreement with the previous experimental results of Ashkaliev et al [2003], Yakovets et al [2008], and Yakovets et al [2013]. As was pointed out by Ashkaliev et al [2003], these observations are also consistent with the theoretical calculations of TID relationships provided by Millward et al [1993, Figure 6].…”
Section: 1002/2016rs006036supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the long history of TID observation, the generic relationship between f o F 2 and h m (as well as virtual height) discussed in this paper has only occasionally been recognized [e.g., Vlasov et al ., ; Shiokawa et al ., ; Liu et al ., ] and the relationship of these parameters with the subpeak thickness y m , while previously reported [ Ashkaliev et al ., ; Yakovets et al ., , , , ; Pezzopane et al ., ], continues to remain little known in the ionospheric community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is determined using a low‐pass band filter technique that atmospheric GWs are responsible for these in meridional wind velocities. The response of several parameters of the nighttime F layer to the passage of an atmospheric GW produced during the significant magnetic storm on 24–25 July 2004, is investigated using data from the Almaty ionospheric vertical sounding (Yakovets et al., 2008). The phase relationships between fluctuations in the electron density at the maximum of the F2 layer (NmF2), the layer maximum height of the F2 layer (hmF2), and the layer half‐thickness were calculated by the slope of the wave phase front.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peculiarity lies in the fact that the LSTIDs in the N m F (t) variations are manifested much weaker than in the N h (t) variations at fixed heights located below the height of the layer maximum. The reasons for this altitudinal dependence of the ionosphere response to AGW passage were considered in [6].…”
Section: Description Of the Equipment And Observation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%