2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-016-3495-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of the North Atlantic dynamic sea level and circulation to Greenland meltwater and climate change in an eddy-permitting ocean model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we conclude that presently the GFWA could not cause the observed freshening in the SPNA during the 2010s. This result agrees with the previous study of Saenko et al (), who also show that the GFWA of similar magnitude (and even double of this magnitude) has negligibly small impact on the SPNA thermohaline fields, barely impacting AMOC. Thus, the present model experiments suggest that additional freshwater sources must have contributed to the recent freshening.…”
Section: Gfwa and Observed Fresheningsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, we conclude that presently the GFWA could not cause the observed freshening in the SPNA during the 2010s. This result agrees with the previous study of Saenko et al (), who also show that the GFWA of similar magnitude (and even double of this magnitude) has negligibly small impact on the SPNA thermohaline fields, barely impacting AMOC. Thus, the present model experiments suggest that additional freshwater sources must have contributed to the recent freshening.…”
Section: Gfwa and Observed Fresheningsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This type of SSH anomaly in the Canadian Archipelago is also a feature of a weaker than normal AMOC at 40°N (Figure j). The change in the ocean circulation associated with a weakening of the AMOC leads quasi‐instantaneously to regional dynamic sea level rise (Levermann et al, ; Saenko et al, ). This has been observed in the North Atlantic; for example, a 128‐mm jump in coastal sea level north of New York City in 2009–2010 has been associated with a 30% reduction of the AMOC (Goddard et al, ).…”
Section: Discussion: Mechanisms Behind Strait Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An issue of potentially similar importance is the area where deep convection occurs, which is much larger in models than is believed to be the case in observations (e.g., Feucher et al, ). This issue can at least in part be related to resolution and eddy exchange off the west Greenland Current (e.g., Saenko et al, 2017; Chanut et al, 2008). However, that in itself does not seem to be sufficient as the AMOC cell in VIKING005 is still too shallow (and not deeper than other models with poor overflows, Figure ).…”
Section: Areas In Need Of Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%