2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00803.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Surface Method Based on Radial Basis Functions for Modeling Large‐Scale Structures in Model Updating

Abstract: The response surface (RS) method based on radial basis functions (RBFs) is proposed to model the input–output system of large‐scale structures for model updating in this article. As a methodology study, the complicated implicit relationships between the design parameters and response characteristics of cable‐stayed bridges are employed in the construction of an RS. The key issues for application of the proposed method are discussed, such as selecting the optimal shape parameters of RBFs, generating samples by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported 89.0 % sensitivity and 93.2 % specificity using an SVM classifier. Babu et al [17] report a classification accuracy of 82.3 % using a metacognitive radial basis function (RBF) network classifier [16,59] to distinguish between PD subjects and healthy controls based on structural MRI data. Martinez-Murcia et al [37] report an accuracy of 91.3 % using an SVM with an RBF kernel to classify PD vs. HC based on dopaminergic functional imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported 89.0 % sensitivity and 93.2 % specificity using an SVM classifier. Babu et al [17] report a classification accuracy of 82.3 % using a metacognitive radial basis function (RBF) network classifier [16,59] to distinguish between PD subjects and healthy controls based on structural MRI data. Martinez-Murcia et al [37] report an accuracy of 91.3 % using an SVM with an RBF kernel to classify PD vs. HC based on dopaminergic functional imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bajaj and Pachori [18] classified sleep EEG signals based on the time-frequency image (TFI) of EEG signals obtained by the Smoothed Pseudo Wigner-Ville Distribution method. Histogram-based features for each sub-images of EEG signals, corresponding to different frequency bands, are computed from TFI and classified by multiclass least squares support vector machines (SVMs) [21] with radial basis function [22,23] and Mexican hat and Morlet wavelet kernel functions [24,25]. Gunes et al [26] describe a sleep stage recognition system using EEG signals and k-means clustering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time consuming and convergence problem arise when the model is complicated. The response surface method is becoming popular for its fast-running and good convergence properties [23][24][25][26][27]. This method uses design of experiment (DOE) method to create samples for updating parameters and calculate the response at each sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%