2004
DOI: 10.1239/aap/1093962238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response times in M/M/s fork-join networks

Abstract: We study a fork-join processing network in which jobs arrive according to a Poisson process and each job splits into m tasks, which are simultaneously assigned to m nodes that operate like M/M/s queueing systems. When all of its tasks are finished, the job is completed. The main result is a closed-form formula for approximating the distribution of the network's response time (the time to complete a job) in equilibrium. We also present an analogous approximation for the distribution of the equilibrium queue len… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 1 we present the Monte Carlo estimates of E W for the fork-join network with K = 2, λ = 1, s i = 1, and different values of µ i and N . From Table 1 we can see that the approximations, given in [9] with N = ∞, are very close to the Monte Carlo estimates using perfect simulation with a finite value of N. Obviously, the fork-join network with N = ∞, on average, has a longer queue at equilibrium than the fork-join network with a finite value of N . Carlo estimate with N = 300 and the dashed line is the approximation in [9] with N = ∞.…”
Section: Simulation Results For Response Timessupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Table 1 we present the Monte Carlo estimates of E W for the fork-join network with K = 2, λ = 1, s i = 1, and different values of µ i and N . From Table 1 we can see that the approximations, given in [9] with N = ∞, are very close to the Monte Carlo estimates using perfect simulation with a finite value of N. Obviously, the fork-join network with N = ∞, on average, has a longer queue at equilibrium than the fork-join network with a finite value of N . Carlo estimate with N = 300 and the dashed line is the approximation in [9] with N = ∞.…”
Section: Simulation Results For Response Timessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We can also compare the Monte Carlo estimates and the approximation in [9] for F (t) = P(W ≤ t). With µ 1 = 10 and µ 2 = 20, the results are shown in Figure 2, where the solid line (the Monte Carlo estimate) and the dashed line (the approximation given in [9]) are almost the same. If we zoom into the graph (see Figure 3), we can see that the approximation is slightly lower.…”
Section: Simulation Results For Response Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we note that the paired queueing system somewhat resembles a fork-join queueing system; see e.g. [6] and the references therein. However, in fork-join queueing systems both arrivals and departures in the different buffers are synchronised, which leads to entirely different dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%