2015
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa7136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Comment on “Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution”

Abstract: Tong et al. comment on the accuracy of the dating analysis presented in our work on the phylogeny of insects and provide a reanalysis of our data. They replace log-normal priors with uniform priors and add a "roachoid" fossil as a calibration point. Although the reanalysis provides an interesting alternative viewpoint, we maintain that our choices were appropriate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
7
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() where a penalized‐likelihood approach was used to recover the ages of the odonate families. However, the age of the MRCA of odonates is congruent with the analyses performed by Kjer () and Tong et al. (; ~230 mol/L).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…() where a penalized‐likelihood approach was used to recover the ages of the odonate families. However, the age of the MRCA of odonates is congruent with the analyses performed by Kjer () and Tong et al. (; ~230 mol/L).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The ages recovered here for deep nodes are largely incongruent with Letsch et al (2016) where a penalized-likelihood approach was used to recover the ages of the odonate families. However, the age of the MRCA of odonates is congruent with the analyses performed by Kjer (2015) and Tong et al (2015;~230 mol/L). Moreover, the estimated divergence time for the genus Enallagma (Coenagrionidae) is also highly incongruent with Callahan and McPeek (2016) where a sequence divergence rate of 2.3% per million years was used to calibrate the age.…”
Section: The Time-calibrated Phylogeny and Divergence Times Of Odonatsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Our Bayesian phylogeny estimate of 31.21 MYA (95% CI: 41.27-21.16) is earlier than many others due to root prior calibration using the Rhagoletis-Drosophila split estimated by Misof et al (2014), as opposed to calibration using maximum fossil ages. Therefore, assumptions made by Misof et al (2014) will be carried into the age estimates presented here (Kjer et al, 2015;Tong et al, 2015).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis Of Tephritids and The Molecular Clockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These Carboniferous age fossils preserve some of the highly conserved external morphology seen in extant cockroaches but also possess an external ovipositor, a trait not found in any extant dictyopterans. It has been proposed that these fossils could be ancestral polyneopterans (Kjer et al, 2015), on the stem of Dictyoptera (Tong et al, 2015), or even within Blattodea .…”
Section: Calibrations For Basal Dictyopteramentioning
confidence: 99%