2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to letter: Carbon fibre reinforced PEEK versus traditional metallic implants for orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons, efforts have already been made to either adapt the mechanical properties of the metallic implants to those of the bone by investigating other alloys [ 12 , 13 , 14 ] or, for example, by foaming the material [ 15 ]. Efforts are also underway to replace the metallic materials entirely with other materials, such as polymeric composites [ 16 ] or carbon-fiber-reinforced composites [ 17 , 18 ]. Thus, the search for biodegradable material has the greatest relevance, so that a second surgical intervention can be avoided and the material will degrade in the body after a certain time [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, efforts have already been made to either adapt the mechanical properties of the metallic implants to those of the bone by investigating other alloys [ 12 , 13 , 14 ] or, for example, by foaming the material [ 15 ]. Efforts are also underway to replace the metallic materials entirely with other materials, such as polymeric composites [ 16 ] or carbon-fiber-reinforced composites [ 17 , 18 ]. Thus, the search for biodegradable material has the greatest relevance, so that a second surgical intervention can be avoided and the material will degrade in the body after a certain time [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%