Responses of Agricultural Crops to Free-Air CO2 Enrichment

Kimball, Bruce A.; Zhu, Jiang; Cheng, Lei; Kobayashi, Kazuhiko; Bindi, Marco

doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(02)77017-x

Cited by 867 publications

(596 citation statements)

References 97 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

539

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Perhaps the most comprehensive review of crop responses to CO 2 is given by Kimball et al (2002). These authors summarized crop performance under free-air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) experiments, which render results that are closer to field conditions than greenhouse and other controlled environment experiments.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of climate change impact on Eastern Washington agriculture

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A n assessment of the potential impact of climate change and the concurrent increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration on eastern Washington State agriculture was conducted. Climate projections from four selected general circulation models (GCM) were chosen to evaluate impacts for the periods 2010-2039, 2030-2059 and 2070-2099, identified as 2020, 2040, and 2080 scenarios, respectively. All climate projections reflect a warming future climate, but the individual GCMs vary with respect to precipitation changes -some models reflect wetter conditions and some drier. The assessment included the crops with larger economic value for the state at selected representative locations: irrigated apples at Sunnyside; irrigated potatoes at Othello; dryland wheat at Pullman (high precipitation), Saint John (intermediate precipitation), and Lind and Odessa (low precipitation). To evaluate crop performance, a cropping system simulation model (CropSyst) was utilized using historical and future climate sequences, including simulations with and without concurrent elevation of atmospheric CO 2 concentration as given by the IPCC A1B CO 2 emission projection. Crops were assumed to receive adequate water (irrigated crops) and nutrient supply and possible negative impacts from pests and diseases were not accounted for. Simulation results project that the impact of climate change on selected but economically significant crops in eastern Washington will be generally mild in the short term (i.e., next two decades), but increasingly detrimental with time (potential yield losses reaching 25% for some crops by the end of the century). However, the projected CO 2 elevation is expected to provide significant mitigation of climate change effects, and in fact result in yield gains for some crops. Yields of winter wheat, without CO 2 effect, are projected to increase 2% to 8% for the 2020 scenario, tending to decline with further warming in high precipitation locations, but continue increasing to reach a 12% gain by the 2080s in low precipitation locations. With CO 2 elevation, winter wheat yields are projected to increase by 15% for the 2020 scenario, with larger increases later in the century. Spring wheat yields are projected not to change for the 2020 scenario, and decline 10% to 15% (2040), and 20% to 26% (2080) without CO 2 effect. However, earlier planting combined with CO 2 elevation is projected to increase yields by 16% for the 2020 scenario. 191Yields of irrigated potatoes are projected to decline 9%, 15%, and 22% for the 2020, 2040, and 2080 scenarios, respectively, but these losses are significantly smaller (2 to 3%) with CO 2 elevation. Varieties with a longer duration of green leaf area, combined with elevated CO 2 , could potentially result in yield gains of 15%. However, reductions of tuber quality are a concern under warmer conditions. Apple yields are projected to decline 1%, 3%, and 4% for the 2020, 2040, and 2080 scenarios, respectively, but with projected yields increasing 6% (2020), 9% (2040), and...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of climate change impact on Eastern Washington agriculture

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zamski and Schaffer(1996), Lakso and Seeley(1978)는 생육 적온을 초과 하는 온도조건 하에서 원예작물은 광합성률이 저하하는 반 면, 호흡률은 증가하기 때문에 순광합성률이 감소하여 수체 생육 및 품질이 크게 저하된다고 하였다 (Faust, 1989;Tomana and Yamada, 1988;Saure, 1990). 반면에 대기 중 이산화탄 소 농도가 증가하면 이산화탄소 분압이 높아져 대기에서 식 물체 내 광합성 기관까지 이산화탄소가 쉽게 확산될 뿐 아 니라, 광합성 시 이산화탄소 고정효소인 rubisco의 반응이 촉진된다 (Kimball et al, 2002). 따라서 이산화탄소에 민감 하게 반응하는 C 3 식물을 대상으로 한 일련의 연구에서 대 기 중 이산화탄소 농도를 2배 정도 증가시킬 경우 광합성이 약 25-75% 정도 증가한다고 보고되어 있다 (Luxmoore et al, 1993;Urban, 2003).…”

Section: 온도는 식물의 생리･생태에 커다란 영향을 미치며 특히unclassified

Effects of the Elevated Temperature and Carbon Dioxide on Vine Growth and Fruit Quality of ‘Campbell Early’ Grapevines (Vitis labruscana)

Son¹,

Han²,

Cho³

et al. 2014

HST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effects of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on vine growth and characteristics of fruits of three-year-old 'Campbell Early' grapevine were investigated. The treatment groups consisted of a control group (ambient temperature and 390 µL･L -1 CO2), an elevated temperature group (ambient temperature + 4.0°C and 390 µL･L -1 CO2), an elevated CO2 group (ambient temperature and 700 µL･L -1 CO2), and an elevated CO2/temperature group (ambient temperature + 4.0°C and 700 µL･L -1 CO2). The average shoot length was 312.6 cm in the elevated CO2/temperature group, which was higher than the other groups; with 206.2 cm in the control group and 255.6 cm and 224.8 cm in the elevated temperature group and elevated CO2 group respectively. However, the shoot diameter showed a tendency of decreasing in the elevated temperature and elevated CO2/temperature groups. The equatorial diameter of berries was increased in the higher carbon dioxide concentration, and the soluble solid content was the highest in the elevated CO2 group, with 14.6 °Brix among all treatment groups and the lowest in the elevated temperature group (13.9 °Brix). The harvest date was approximately 11 d earlier in the elevated CO2/temperature group and 4 to 2 days earlier in the elevated CO2 group and elevated temperature group, respectively. Regarding the rate of photosynthesis and transpiration during the growth period, higher photosynthetic rates were observed in the elevated CO2 group and the elevated CO2/temperature group during the early stage of growth; however the photosynthetic rate was reduced dramatically in summer, which was contrary to transpiration.

show abstract

“…They found maximum increase of total dry weight (79.7 %), stem dry weight (100.95 %), root dry weight (78.18 %) and leaf dry weight (71.18 %), shoot length (7.37 %) and leaf area (52.54 %) in black gram followed by sunflower, groundnut and sorghum. Kimball et al (2002) reviewed that C 4 crops in general respond less, compared to C 3 crops under elevated CO 2 and Jatropha being a C 3 crop responded well under elevated CO 2 . Vanaja et al (2008) studied growth and yield responses of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) which belongs to the same family as Jatropha, at two elevated CO 2 levels (550 ppm and 700 ppm) in open top chambers (OTCs).…”

Section: Variation In Response For Phenotypic Traitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ainsworth and Rogers (2007) reviewed the response of stomatal conductance to rising CO 2 and observed that elevation of CO 2 in FACE experiments reduced stomatal conductance by 22 %. Various studies by De Souza et al (2008) in sugarcane; (Kimball et al 2002) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), and rice (Oryza sativa L.) which are C 3 grasses; sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Möench), a C 4 grass; white clover (Trifolium repens), a C 3 legume; potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), a C 3 plant with tuber storage; and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and grape (Vitis vinifera L.) which are C 3 woody perennials showed reduced stomatal conductance and transpiration rate with elevated CO 2 .…”

Section: Variation In Response For Physiological Traitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intra- specific variation in response of Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) to elevated CO2 conditions

Sunil

Vanaja

Kumar

et al. 2012

Physiol Mol Biol Plants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Twenty genotypes of Jatropha collected from diverse eco-geographic regions from the states of Chhattisgarh (3), Andhra Pradesh (12), Rajasthan (4) and Uttarakhand (1) of India were subjected to elevated CO 2 conditions. All the genotypes showed significant difference (p<0.05 and 0.01) in the phenotypic traits in both the environments (elevated and ambient) and genotype x environment interaction. Among the physiological traits recorded, maximum photosynthetic rate was observed in IC565048 (48.8 μmol m −2 s −1 ) under ambient controlled conditions while under elevated conditions maximum photosynthetic rate was observed in IC544678 (41.3 μmol m −2 s −1 ), and there was no significant difference in the genotype x environment interaction. Stomatal conductance (Gs) emerged as the key factor as it recorded significant difference among the genotypes, between the environments and also genotype x environment interaction. The Gs and transpiration (E) recorded a significant decline in the genotypes under the elevated CO 2 condition over the ambient control. Under elevated CO 2 conditions, the minimum values recorded for Gs and E were 0.03 mmol m −2 s −1 and 0.59 mmol m −2 s −1 respectively in accession IC565039, while the maximum values for Gs and E were 1.8 mmol m −2 s −1 and 11.5 mmol m −2 s −1 as recorded in accession IC544678. The study resulted in the identification of potential climate ready genotypes viz. IC471314, IC544654, IC541634, IC544313, and IC471333 for future use.

show abstract

Responses of Agricultural Crops to Free-Air CO2 Enrichment

Cited by 867 publications

References 97 publications

Assessment of climate change impact on Eastern Washington agriculture

Assessment of climate change impact on Eastern Washington agriculture

Effects of the Elevated Temperature and Carbon Dioxide on Vine Growth and Fruit Quality of ‘Campbell Early’ Grapevines (Vitis labruscana)

Intra- specific variation in response of Jatropha (Jatropha curcas L.) to elevated CO2 conditions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About