2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of eight chile peppers to saline water irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The leaf Cl − concentrations in the same rose rootstock study ranged from 6.2 to 30 mg g −1 , in the control to EC 8, which were comparable to those found in Jatropha leaves. In our previous studies with a range of ornamental herbaceous plants and a number of peppers, the concentrations of leaf Na + were much lower than those of leaf Cl − [16,17,[19][20][21], while in the current study Jatropha leaf Na + concentrations were higher than leaf Cl − . The relatively high levels of Na + accumulated in Jatropha leaves may be responsible for the observed salt damage and growth reduction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The leaf Cl − concentrations in the same rose rootstock study ranged from 6.2 to 30 mg g −1 , in the control to EC 8, which were comparable to those found in Jatropha leaves. In our previous studies with a range of ornamental herbaceous plants and a number of peppers, the concentrations of leaf Na + were much lower than those of leaf Cl − [16,17,[19][20][21], while in the current study Jatropha leaf Na + concentrations were higher than leaf Cl − . The relatively high levels of Na + accumulated in Jatropha leaves may be responsible for the observed salt damage and growth reduction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…in ICP 13997 than Sel 85N. Therefore, conclusion of genotypic differences observed in the present study in response to NaCl and Cd stresses depended on the intrinsic differences in rates of toxic ion uptake, transport and distribution within the plant (Niu et al 2010;Lenis et al 2011;Fatehi et al 2012).…”
Section: 05) As Determined By Dunnett's Multiple Comparison Testmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The detrimental impact of salinity on chile ancho plants (C. annuum 'Caballero') varies for each tissue; fruits are more sensitive than leaves and stems (Azuma et al, 2010). On the other hand, C. annuum 'NMCA10652' has shown more tolerance to salinity treatments, having a 100% survival rate and showing no significant changes in plant growth and fruit yield up to a soil electrical conductivity (EC) of 4.1 dS · m -1 (Niu et al, 2010a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%