The fact that olfactory systems are highly conserved in all animal species from insects to mammals allow the generalization of findings from one species to another. Most of our knowledge about the anatomy and physiology of the olfactory system comes from data obtained in a very limited number of biological models such as rodents, Zebrafish, Drosophila, and a worm, Caenorhabditis elegans. These models have proved useful to answer most questions in the field of olfaction, and thus concentrating on these few models appear to be a pragmatic strategy. However, the diversity of the organization and physiology of the olfactory system amongst phyla appear to be greater than generally assumed and the four models alone may not be sufficient to address all the questions arising from the study of olfaction. In this article, we will illustrate the idea that we should take advantage of biological diversity to address specific scientific questions and will show that the Xenopus olfactory system is a very good model to investigate: first, olfaction in aerial versus aquatic conditions and second, mechanisms underlying postnatal reorganization of the olfactory system especially those controlled by tyroxine hormone. Anat Rec, 296:1453-1461, 2013. V C 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Key words: olfaction; Caenorhabditis; DrosophilaIn most species, from insects to mammals, the main organization of the olfactory system is very similar (see for reviews: Holley and Mac Leod, 1977;Hildebrand and Shepherd, 1997). This leads to the idea that the functional organization of the olfactory system is highly conserved among phyla. As a consequence, most studies in olfaction are based on the study of four main models, that is, rodents, Zebrafish, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis. Eventhough these are powerful models, careful examination demonstrates that despite the similarities for the main features, there is considerable variability amongst species in the way the olfactory system is organized (Eisthen and Polesse, 2007). Rather than ignoring these variations, we believe they should be highlighted. When, in a given species, special features offer a unique opportunity to address specific questions better than the four other classical models, then the use of this model has to be considered. In this context, the aim of this article is, after short description of the