1981
DOI: 10.1139/z81-076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of nonflying moths to ultrasound: the threat of gleaning bats

Abstract: Stationary and walking tympanate moths (Arctiidae, Geometridae, Noctuidae, and Notodontidae) exhibited discrete behavioural responses to electronically simulated bat echolocation calls. The presence of a stationary response in a given species was strongly correlated with the presence of a walking response in the same species. Some inter- and intra-specific variability in the presence of this behaviour was observed and the evolutionary implications of this variability are discussed. Such behavioural responses b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, the behavioral experiments indicate that the males produce ''hushed'' ultrasonic songs to suppress the female's escape behavior during courtship. The female's response to the ultrasonic songs might be cognate to the freezing behavior, which is induced in response to the echolocation calls of bats as a defense maneuver (1,7,17,18). This raises the intriguing possibility that the moths have exploited both the sensory apparatus and the behavioral reaction they ''inherited'' from their interaction with bats.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, the behavioral experiments indicate that the males produce ''hushed'' ultrasonic songs to suppress the female's escape behavior during courtship. The female's response to the ultrasonic songs might be cognate to the freezing behavior, which is induced in response to the echolocation calls of bats as a defense maneuver (1,7,17,18). This raises the intriguing possibility that the moths have exploited both the sensory apparatus and the behavioral reaction they ''inherited'' from their interaction with bats.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, this behaviour would protect the moth from predation by gleaning bats (Werner, 1981 and Baker, 2003), and may correlate to the last chance manoeuvres of moths hunted on the wing by aerial hawking bats. The advantage of the walking bioassay is that it allows for a precise estimate of response thresholds to acoustic stimuli both with and without odour stimulation, which would be very difficult to obtain for a flying moth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately halfway between the odour source and the release site the moth was stimulated with batlike ultrasound from a loudspeaker. A walking moth responds to ultrasound by 'freezing' and remaining stationary for some time (see also Werner, 1981;Rydell et al, 2000;Greenfield and Weber, 2000). Moths were presented with sound stimuli of different intensities and the behavioural thresholds to sound stimuli were determined at different pheromone qualities and quantities.…”
Section: The Walking Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moths use a "simple" thoracic ear, consisting of two sensory neurons attached to a tympanic membrane, to detect predator sounds (30). Flying moths may respond to bat sound by eliciting different evasive maneuvers, whereas walking moths on the vegetation will "freeze" (31,32). However, Author contributions: S.A., K.E., P.A., and N.S.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%